Effect of aging on audiovisual integration: Comparison of high- and low-intensity conditions in a speech discrimination task

Weiping Yang, Ao Guo, Hanyun Yao, Xiangfu Yang, Zimo Li, Shengnan Li, Jianxin Chen, Yanna Ren*, Jiajia Yang, Jinglong Wu, Zhilin Zhang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Audiovisual integration is an essential process that influences speech perception in conversation. However, it is still debated whether older individuals benefit more from audiovisual integration than younger individuals. This ambiguity is likely due to stimulus features, such as stimulus intensity. The purpose of the current study was to explore the effect of aging on audiovisual integration, using event-related potentials (ERPs) at different stimulus intensities. The results showed greater audiovisual integration in older adults at 320–360 ms. Conversely, at 460–500 ms, older adults displayed attenuated audiovisual integration in the frontal, fronto-central, central, and centro-parietal regions compared to younger adults. In addition, we found older adults had greater audiovisual integration at 200–230 ms under the low-intensity condition compared to the high-intensity condition, suggesting inverse effectiveness occurred. However, inverse effectiveness was not found in younger adults. Taken together, the results suggested that there was age-related dissociation in audiovisual integration and inverse effectiveness, indicating that the neural mechanisms underlying audiovisual integration differed between older adults and younger adults.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1010060
JournalFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • aging
  • audiovisual integration
  • inverse effectiveness
  • speech perception
  • stimulus intensity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of aging on audiovisual integration: Comparison of high- and low-intensity conditions in a speech discrimination task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this