TY - GEN
T1 - Computational Spectral Imaging with Unified Encoding Model and beyond
AU - Liu, Xinyuan
AU - Li, Lingen
AU - Zhu, Lin
AU - Wang, Lizhi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Computational spectral imaging is drawing increasing attention owing to the snapshot advantage, and amplitude, phase, and wavelength encoding systems are three types of representative implementations. Fairly comparing and understanding the performance of these systems is essential, but challenging due to the heterogeneity in encoding design. To overcome this limitation, we propose the unified encoding model (UEM) that covers all physical systems using the three encoding types. Specifically, the UEM comprises physical amplitude, physical phase, and physical wavelength encoding models that can be combined with a digital decoding model in a joint encoder-decoder optimization framework to compare the three systems under a unified experimental setup fairly. Furthermore, we extend the UEMs to ideal versions, namely, ideal amplitude, ideal phase, and ideal wavelength encoding models, which are free from physical constraints, to explore the full potential of the three types of computational spectral imaging systems. Finally, we conduct a holistic comparison of the three types of computational spectral imaging systems and provide valuable insights for designing and exploiting these systems in the future.
AB - Computational spectral imaging is drawing increasing attention owing to the snapshot advantage, and amplitude, phase, and wavelength encoding systems are three types of representative implementations. Fairly comparing and understanding the performance of these systems is essential, but challenging due to the heterogeneity in encoding design. To overcome this limitation, we propose the unified encoding model (UEM) that covers all physical systems using the three encoding types. Specifically, the UEM comprises physical amplitude, physical phase, and physical wavelength encoding models that can be combined with a digital decoding model in a joint encoder-decoder optimization framework to compare the three systems under a unified experimental setup fairly. Furthermore, we extend the UEMs to ideal versions, namely, ideal amplitude, ideal phase, and ideal wavelength encoding models, which are free from physical constraints, to explore the full potential of the three types of computational spectral imaging systems. Finally, we conduct a holistic comparison of the three types of computational spectral imaging systems and provide valuable insights for designing and exploiting these systems in the future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206445718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CVPRW63382.2024.00144
DO - 10.1109/CVPRW63382.2024.00144
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85206445718
T3 - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops
SP - 1368
EP - 1378
BT - Proceedings - 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPRW 2024
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPRW 2024
Y2 - 16 June 2024 through 22 June 2024
ER -