Comparison study on Langlie method and up-and-down method for sensitivity test of explosive

Jun Ming Yuan*, Qing Ming Zhang, Yan Liu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The test theory, design procedure and data analysis of Langlie method and up-and-down method were analyzed, and the experimental results of impact sensitivity of certain explosive HMX were compared. The results show that Langlie method is almost insensitive to the initial estimate, while up-and-down method is sensitive to that. In addition, according to the experimental data, the fire probability of samples was attained at the same stimulus with two different methods. The sensitivity distribution curves were obtained from fitting the experimental data. When the safety and reliability of explosive is calculated on the basis of counting process method, the estimate value of Langlie method is more optimistic than that of up-and-down method. When the 0.001 responses is evaluated, the stimulus relative error of Langlie method is about 16% higher than that of up-and-down method, when the 0.999 responses is evaluated, the stimulus relative error of Langlie method is about 21% lower than that of up-and-down method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-89
Number of pages4
JournalHanneng Cailiao/Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials
Volume16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

Keywords

  • Explosion mechanics
  • Langlie method
  • Reliability
  • Safety
  • Sensitivity test
  • Up-and-down method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison study on Langlie method and up-and-down method for sensitivity test of explosive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this