Comparison of dynamic fracture toughness and critical J-integral criteria under high loading rates

Changzeng Fan, Zejian Xu*, Yang Han, Gang Wu, Rui He, Hao Cui, Zhicheng Cai, Yan Liu, Fenglei Huang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Dynamic fracture toughness (DFT) and the critical J-integral are two key criteria traditionally used to assess the onset of crack initiation in materials. These criteria, however, are not interchangeable within the elastic–plastic range. Consequently, understanding their validity becomes crucial, particularly when the material's failure mode changes. In this study, we employed the electromagnetic Hopkinson bar technique and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to conduct compact tensile tests on two ultra-high-strength steels (UHSS) under high loading rates. DFT was determined through an experimental–numerical method, while the critical J-integral was obtained indirectly using the DIC technique. The crack initiation mode was identified by analyzing the fracture morphology at the crack tip. The findings reveal that as the crack initiation mode shifts, the DFT criterion becomes less reliable in characterizing a material's resistance to crack initiation. In contrast, the critical J-integral remains a robust and applicable measure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number111035
JournalEngineering Fracture Mechanics
Volume319
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 May 2025

Keywords

  • Crack initiation mode
  • Critical J-integral
  • Dynamic fracture toughness
  • Electromagnetic driving

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of dynamic fracture toughness and critical J-integral criteria under high loading rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Fan, C., Xu, Z., Han, Y., Wu, G., He, R., Cui, H., Cai, Z., Liu, Y., & Huang, F. (2025). Comparison of dynamic fracture toughness and critical J-integral criteria under high loading rates. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 319, Article 111035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111035