Artificial intelligence–based full aortic CT angiography imaging with ultra-low-dose contrast medium: a preliminary study

Objectives: To further reduce the contrast medium (CM) dose of full aortic CT angiography (ACTA) imaging using the augmented cycle-consistent adversarial framework (Au-CycleGAN) algorithm. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 150 consecutive patients with suspected aortic disease. All received ACTA scans of ultra-low-dose CM (ULDCM) protocol and low-dose CM (LDCM) protocol. These data were randomly assigned to the training datasets (n = 100) and the validation datasets (n = 50). The ULDCM images were reconstructed by the Au-CycleGAN algorithm. Then, the AI-based ULDCM images were compared with LDCM images in terms of image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Results: The mean image quality score of each location in the AI-based ULDCM group was higher than that in the ULDCM group but a little lower than that in the LDCM group (all p < 0.05). All AI-based ULDCM images met the diagnostic requirements (score ≥ 3). Except for the image noise, the AI-based ULDCM images had higher attenuation value than the ULDCM and LDCM images as well as higher SNR and CNR in all locations of the aorta analyzed (all p < 0.05). Similar results were also seen in obese patients (BMI > 25, all p < 0.05). Using the findings of LDCM images as the reference, the AI-based ULDCM images showed good diagnostic parameters and no significant differences in any of the analyzed aortic disease diagnoses (all K-values > 0.80, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The required dose of CM for full ACTA imaging can be reduced to one-third of the CM dose of the LDCM protocol while maintaining image quality and diagnostic accuracy using the Au-CycleGAN algorithm. Key Points: • The required dose of contrast medium (CM) for full ACTA imaging can be reduced to one-third of the CM dose of the low-dose contrast medium (LDCM) protocol using the Au-CycleGAN algorithm. • Except for the image noise, the AI-based ultra-low-dose contrast medium (ULDCM) images had better quantitative image quality parameters than the ULDCM and LDCM images. • No significant diagnostic differences were noted between the AI-based ULDCM and LDCM images regarding all the analyzed aortic disease diagnoses.