Anti-RGPO method based on memory tracking

Jiang Changyong*, Gao Meiguo, Fu Xiongjun, Wang Zongbo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Range Gate Pull Off (RGPO) results in a disaster to radar target tracking. It is assumed that the jamming (i.e., RGPO measurement, the following are the same) pulls the range gate backwards in the conventional methods. However, the RGPO for some Radar, e.g., Linear Frequency Modulation Radar, can pull onwards by modulating the doppler frequency to the returned signal. What's more, in conventional methods targets were modeled as point targets. Nevertheless, further studies are required when the target and jamming are extended in real-world environment. Previous researches failed to consider the lasting time of the anti-RGPO process, which is crucial under a certain condition. To avoid these drawbacks, a method based on memory tracking is studied. The method can detect the existence of RGPO and recognize the pulling-off direction of the jamming; and the method can make the jamming get out of the range gate earlier than the true target, thus the RGPO has little effect on the tracking. Some important factors in the method are analyzed. Experiments show that the total time of the anti-RGPO process is short.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Radar, Radar 2008
Pages365-370
Number of pages6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Event2008 International Conference on Radar, Radar 2008 - Adelaide, SA, Australia
Duration: 2 Sept 20085 Sept 2008

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Radar, Radar 2008

Conference

Conference2008 International Conference on Radar, Radar 2008
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityAdelaide, SA
Period2/09/085/09/08

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-RGPO method based on memory tracking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this