A two-phase procedure for non-normal quantitative trait genetic association study

Wei Zhang, Huiyun Li*, Zhaohai Li, Qizhai Li

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: The nonparametric trend test (NPT) is well suitable for identifying the genetic variants associated with quantitative traits when the trait values do not satisfy the normal distribution assumption. If the genetic model, defined according to the mode of inheritance, is known, the NPT derived under the given genetic model is optimal. However, in practice, the genetic model is often unknown beforehand. The NPT derived from an uncorrected model might result in loss of power. When the underlying genetic model is unknown, a robust test is preferred to maintain satisfactory power. Results: We propose a two-phase procedure to handle the uncertainty of the genetic model for non-normal quantitative trait genetic association study. First, a model selection procedure is employed to help choose the genetic model. Then the optimal test derived under the selected model is constructed to test for possible association. To control the type I error rate, we derive the joint distribution of the test statistics developed in the two phases and obtain the proper size. Conclusions: The proposed method is more robust than existing methods through the simulation results and application to gene DNAH9 from the Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 for associated with Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody further demonstrate its performance.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number52
    JournalBMC Bioinformatics
    Volume17
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Jan 2016

    Keywords

    • Model selection
    • Quantitative trait genetic association studies
    • Robustness
    • Two-phase procedure

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A two-phase procedure for non-normal quantitative trait genetic association study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this