车用汽油及含氧燃料的环境效应

Translated title of the contribution: Environmental impacts of gasoline and oxygenated fuels when used on light-duty vehicles

Meng Zhu Zhang, Chun Xiao Hao, Yun Shan Ge*, Xin Wang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on the WLTC test results of seven China-6 compliant light-duty vehicles, the global warming potential (GWP), ozone formation potential (OFP), and non-methane organic gases (NMOG) with gasoline, E10, and MTBE10 were calculated and discussed. The GWP of crew-averaged N2O and CH4 emissions were respectively 0.6 and 0.07g CO2e/km. The GWP of non-CO2 greenhouse gases with E10 and MTBE10 fuelling was higher than those of gasoline. Bio-E10 is capable of removing 5%~15% of life-cycle GWP from gasoline vehicles. E10 and MTBE10 both tended to increase benzene hydrocarbon (BHC) emissions and therefore OFP. The NMOG from the test vehicles was roughly 30mg/km. The employment of oxygenated fuels, such as E10 and MTBE10, didn’t result in an obvious increase in NMOG.

Translated title of the contributionEnvironmental impacts of gasoline and oxygenated fuels when used on light-duty vehicles
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)1545-1551
Number of pages7
JournalZhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science
Volume42
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental impacts of gasoline and oxygenated fuels when used on light-duty vehicles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this