Magnetorheological semi-active shock mitigation control. Part I: numerical analysis and preliminary tests

Weihan Li, Xianxu “Frank” Bai*, Ping Jiang, Ling Yuan, Hui Liu, Pu Gao, Anding Zhu, Jiabao Pan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minimizing shock loads transmitted to sensitive structures or equipment is the objective of shock mitigation control. The core of shock mitigation control using magnetorheological (MR) energy absorber (EA) to minimize impact load is to make full use of the piston stroke of MREA so as to achieve “soft-landing.” The key lies in the precise description of the hysteresis of MREA and the shock mitigation control method. In this part, a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) shock mitigation control system using MREA is established, and the corresponding dynamic model and drop-induced shock mitigation test system are established. Based on the optimal Bi number control method and constant force control theory, feedforward controllers featuring resistor-capacitor (RC) operator-based hysteresis model and Bingham model are established to realize “soft-landing” in sequence. Specific performance evaluation indexes for shock mitigation control systems, that is, average velocity change rate (AVCR) and velocity-acceleration conversion ratio (V-ACR), are proposed. The effectiveness of shock mitigation control methods with different models on the MREA-based shock mitigation control system in profiles of simulation and tests are compared and analyzed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1885-1901
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
Volume34
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Keywords

  • RC operator
  • Shock mitigation
  • hysteresis model
  • magnetorheological
  • semi-active control
  • soft-landing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnetorheological semi-active shock mitigation control. Part I: numerical analysis and preliminary tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this