TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of piston dynamic on the working processes of an opposed-piston two-stroke folded-cranktrain engine
AU - Zhang, Zhenyu
AU - Zhao, Changlu
AU - Wu, Dan
AU - Zhang, Fujun
AU - Luo, Guoliang
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - An opposed-piston two-stroke folded-cranktrain diesel engine was studied in this paper. In order to achieve asymmetric scavenging, asymmetric angle between two crank throws were designed. However asymmetric crank-throw angle has direct effect on the piston dynamic, which affects engine performance. This paper investigated the characteristics of the piston dynamic on an opposed-piston two-stroke folded-cranktrain diesel engine; effects of the asymmetric angle on the piston displacement, velocity and acceleration were analyzed; further researches were done to studied the effect of piston dynamic on the gas exchange performance and in-cylinder performance. The results show that, larger asymmetric angle is positive for the scavenging efficiency but negative for combustion. The 8.5° CA asymmetric angle showed better fuel economical and IMEP due to better mix and combustion at 2200 r/min, while the 6° CA asymmetric angle showed better fuel economical and IMEP due to better scavenging efficiency at 1000 r/min.
AB - An opposed-piston two-stroke folded-cranktrain diesel engine was studied in this paper. In order to achieve asymmetric scavenging, asymmetric angle between two crank throws were designed. However asymmetric crank-throw angle has direct effect on the piston dynamic, which affects engine performance. This paper investigated the characteristics of the piston dynamic on an opposed-piston two-stroke folded-cranktrain diesel engine; effects of the asymmetric angle on the piston displacement, velocity and acceleration were analyzed; further researches were done to studied the effect of piston dynamic on the gas exchange performance and in-cylinder performance. The results show that, larger asymmetric angle is positive for the scavenging efficiency but negative for combustion. The 8.5° CA asymmetric angle showed better fuel economical and IMEP due to better mix and combustion at 2200 r/min, while the 6° CA asymmetric angle showed better fuel economical and IMEP due to better scavenging efficiency at 1000 r/min.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899537569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4271/2014-01-1628
DO - 10.4271/2014-01-1628
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84899537569
SN - 0148-7191
VL - 1
JO - SAE Technical Papers
JF - SAE Technical Papers
T2 - SAE 2014 World Congress and Exhibition
Y2 - 8 April 2014 through 10 April 2014
ER -