Abstract
Fountain codes are erasure channels in superior performance of sparse matrix code. Files are transmitted into multiple small packets, each of which is either received without error or not received. Fountain codes are based on the packets communication. The decoder can start to transmit packets without any knowledge of which packets are received. In the paper, introduce the fountain code, LT code, BP code and Gauss code. Encode the packets and using different method to decode the packets. Compared BP code and Gauss code on successful decode rate, required time and overhead packets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings - 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2011 |
Pages | 737-740 |
Number of pages | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Event | 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2011 - Shanghai, China Duration: 6 Jan 2011 → 7 Jan 2011 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings - 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2011 |
---|---|
Volume | 1 |
Conference
Conference | 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2011 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | China |
City | Shanghai |
Period | 6/01/11 → 7/01/11 |
Keywords
- BP code Gauss code
- Fountain code
- Headpackets rate
- LT codes
- Required timeover
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of BP and Gauss code base on fountain code'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
Zhang, F., Xu, L., & Pan, X. (2011). Comparison of BP and Gauss code base on fountain code. In Proceedings - 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2011 (pp. 737-740). Article 5720889 (Proceedings - 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2011; Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2011.186