A New Model-Free Deadbeat Predictive Current Control for PMSM Using Parameter-Free Luenberger Disturbance Observer

Nan Yang, Shuo Zhang*, Xueping Li, Xuerong Li

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deadbeat predictive current control (DPCC) has been widely used in the field of permanent magnet synchronous motor current control due to its fast dynamic response, good current followability, and a small amount of calculation. However, the accuracy of its predictive model depends heavily on the accuracy of motor parameters. When the motor parameters are mismatched due to temperature changes and magnetic saturation during operation, the robustness of its control is greatly reduced. Based on the above reasons, model-free deadbeat predictive current control with Luenberger disturbance observer (MFDPCC-LDO) method is proposed in this article. This method uses the LDO without motor parameters to estimate the total disturbance of the system, then calculates the predictive control voltage combined with the ultralocal model, and performs delay compensation. It only needs the input and output of the system and the determination of three control parameters, and it is not affected by motor parameter mismatch, and internal and external interference. The simulation and experimental results verify the effectiveness of the improved MFDPCC + LDO method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-417
Number of pages11
JournalIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Luenberger disturbance observer (LDO)
  • model-free deadbeat predictive current control (DPCC)
  • parameter mismatch
  • permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM)
  • ultralocal model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A New Model-Free Deadbeat Predictive Current Control for PMSM Using Parameter-Free Luenberger Disturbance Observer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this