TY - JOUR
T1 - Whether the electrochemical energy storage show positive role to achieve the green and low-carbon goal in China
AU - Zhang, Hongliang
AU - Liu, Ziyi
AU - Yu, Yajuan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/10/30
Y1 - 2025/10/30
N2 - This study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of electrochemical energy storage (EES). We define the functional unit as the combined “Power source + EES” system at a representative Chinese station and establish cradle-to-grave boundaries covering production, transportation, operation, and disposal stage. Based on data from a specific EES, we construct a detailed lifecycle inventory and assess impacts across all stages. The results indicate that the LFP battery is the primary component to environmental burdens, accounting for over 70 % of the total impact in 7 out of 10 environmental impact categories. The operation stage emerges as the predominant phase, responsible for more than 65 % of the total lifecycle environmental burdens across 7 of the 10 categories. Environmental benefits primarily originate from increased renewable energy integration enabled by EES installation during the operation stage, whereas the disposal stage yields net environmental benefits across all impact categories except one. As renewable energy penetration rises, these benefits grow significantly, while burdens decline for all categories except two.
AB - This study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of electrochemical energy storage (EES). We define the functional unit as the combined “Power source + EES” system at a representative Chinese station and establish cradle-to-grave boundaries covering production, transportation, operation, and disposal stage. Based on data from a specific EES, we construct a detailed lifecycle inventory and assess impacts across all stages. The results indicate that the LFP battery is the primary component to environmental burdens, accounting for over 70 % of the total impact in 7 out of 10 environmental impact categories. The operation stage emerges as the predominant phase, responsible for more than 65 % of the total lifecycle environmental burdens across 7 of the 10 categories. Environmental benefits primarily originate from increased renewable energy integration enabled by EES installation during the operation stage, whereas the disposal stage yields net environmental benefits across all impact categories except one. As renewable energy penetration rises, these benefits grow significantly, while burdens decline for all categories except two.
KW - Conjugate system
KW - Electrochemical energy storage
KW - Environmental impact
KW - Life cycle assessment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012983750
U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137914
DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137914
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105012983750
SN - 0360-5442
VL - 335
JO - Energy
JF - Energy
M1 - 137914
ER -