TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of farmer field schools in productivity, efficiency and environmental sustainability of facility vegetable production
AU - Chen, Yiming
AU - Cai, Jinyang
AU - Hu, Ruifa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2026.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - China produces half of the world’s vegetables on only 1.7% of global croplands, yet accounts for 7.8% of global chemical fertilizer use, underscoring a yield–chemical tradeoff. Although Farmer Field Schools (FFS) are known to raise yields or curb chemical inputs, the literature has overlooked two dimensions—production input substitution and system-wide production efficiency. Using 257 farm-level observations from vegetable farms in Beijing, this study contributes by conducting a production efficiency analysis of inputs (labor, irrigation water, fertilizers, pesticides) and outputs (tomato yield, net income) to estimate the direct and spillover effects of FFS on productivity, efficiency, and environmental performance. The results showed that FFS participation is associated with lower labor use and reduced fertilizer and pesticide intensities, while increasing yield, net income, and production efficiency. Smaller but similar improvements were observed among non-participating neighbors, indicating the existence of spillover effects. These findings highlight FFS as a scalable approach for jointly improving the economic welfare and environmental practices of farms in China’s vegetable sector.
AB - China produces half of the world’s vegetables on only 1.7% of global croplands, yet accounts for 7.8% of global chemical fertilizer use, underscoring a yield–chemical tradeoff. Although Farmer Field Schools (FFS) are known to raise yields or curb chemical inputs, the literature has overlooked two dimensions—production input substitution and system-wide production efficiency. Using 257 farm-level observations from vegetable farms in Beijing, this study contributes by conducting a production efficiency analysis of inputs (labor, irrigation water, fertilizers, pesticides) and outputs (tomato yield, net income) to estimate the direct and spillover effects of FFS on productivity, efficiency, and environmental performance. The results showed that FFS participation is associated with lower labor use and reduced fertilizer and pesticide intensities, while increasing yield, net income, and production efficiency. Smaller but similar improvements were observed among non-participating neighbors, indicating the existence of spillover effects. These findings highlight FFS as a scalable approach for jointly improving the economic welfare and environmental practices of farms in China’s vegetable sector.
KW - Agricultural input management
KW - Facility vegetable production
KW - Farmer field school
KW - Sustainable development
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105029668716
U2 - 10.1007/s10668-025-07267-0
DO - 10.1007/s10668-025-07267-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105029668716
SN - 1387-585X
JO - Environment, Development and Sustainability
JF - Environment, Development and Sustainability
ER -