TY - JOUR
T1 - Response-preserving surrogate acceleration of SHPB explicit-dynamics simulations
T2 - A mechanics-informed benchmark with event-centered supervision
AU - He, Bingchang
AU - Fan, Qunbo
AU - Xie, Wenqiang
AU - Xu, Shun
AU - Yang, Lin
AU - Cheng, Xingwang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
PY - 2026/11/1
Y1 - 2026/11/1
N2 - Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) explicit-dynamics simulations provide high-fidelity forward maps from constitutive descriptors and loading conditions to bar-strain histories and reconstructed specimen response, but repeated evaluations remain computationally expensive. This work develops a response-preserving surrogate that predicts incident, reflected, and transmitted bar-strain histories rather than stress–strain curves directly, and then recovers specimen response through fixed SHPB reconstruction and event extraction. The simulation-derived benchmark contains 100,000 LS-DYNA samples over a representative metallic property domain, combined with stratified impact loading, Johnson–Cook admissibility checks, finite-pulse and loadability screening, and response labeling. Six sequence-aware temporal backbones are evaluated under multiple split protocols for waveform-history prediction. The results show that event-centered supervision improves reconstructed-response fidelity and failure-event localization, and that waveform-history prediction better preserves event-sensitive response than direct stress–strain prediction or non-temporal reduced-basis baselines. After training, the surrogate provides a reusable evaluator for repeated SHPB parameter queries while retaining the standard wave-to-response reconstruction chain. The framework therefore supports efficient constitutive-parameter exploration without replacing the mechanics-based post-processing protocol that defines the measured response.
AB - Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) explicit-dynamics simulations provide high-fidelity forward maps from constitutive descriptors and loading conditions to bar-strain histories and reconstructed specimen response, but repeated evaluations remain computationally expensive. This work develops a response-preserving surrogate that predicts incident, reflected, and transmitted bar-strain histories rather than stress–strain curves directly, and then recovers specimen response through fixed SHPB reconstruction and event extraction. The simulation-derived benchmark contains 100,000 LS-DYNA samples over a representative metallic property domain, combined with stratified impact loading, Johnson–Cook admissibility checks, finite-pulse and loadability screening, and response labeling. Six sequence-aware temporal backbones are evaluated under multiple split protocols for waveform-history prediction. The results show that event-centered supervision improves reconstructed-response fidelity and failure-event localization, and that waveform-history prediction better preserves event-sensitive response than direct stress–strain prediction or non-temporal reduced-basis baselines. After training, the surrogate provides a reusable evaluator for repeated SHPB parameter queries while retaining the standard wave-to-response reconstruction chain. The framework therefore supports efficient constitutive-parameter exploration without replacing the mechanics-based post-processing protocol that defines the measured response.
KW - Event-centered supervision
KW - Explicit-dynamics simulation
KW - Mechanics-informed benchmark
KW - Response reconstruction
KW - Split Hopkinson pressure bar
KW - Surrogate acceleration
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105046119656
U2 - 10.1016/j.cma.2026.119261
DO - 10.1016/j.cma.2026.119261
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105046119656
SN - 0045-7825
VL - 461
JO - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
JF - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
M1 - 119261
ER -