TY - JOUR
T1 - Research status and prospects of dynamic perception and quantitative detection sensors for icing characteristics
AU - Shi, Han
AU - Song, Mengjie
AU - Zhang, Xuan
AU - Zhang, Long
AU - Shao, Keke
AU - Zhen, Zekang
AU - Gao, Runmiao
AU - Chao, Christopher Yu Hang
AU - Kim, Dong Rip
AU - Yi, Xian
AU - Chen, Bin
AU - Huang, Bing
AU - Zhou, You
AU - Du, Zhenyu
AU - Xu, Zhiqiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors.
PY - 2026/10/21
Y1 - 2026/10/21
N2 - Ice detection technologies are essential for mitigating icing hazards in energy, transportation, and other fields in cold and humid environments. This review systematically summarizes the sensing principles, performance metrics, optimization strategies, and applications of ice detection technologies. Based on the physical properties of ice, sensing technologies are classified into acoustic, optical, thermal, electrical, and mechanical, and systematically compared for their capabilities in detecting icing characteristics, including ice type, thickness, and distribution. Optical and acoustic sensors achieve accuracies of about 0.1 mm within a 13 mm detection range, whereas electrical and mechanical sensors offer accuracies of 0.2–1.0 mm within a 20 mm range. Optimization strategies focusing on structures, materials, and algorithms are examined. Representative ice detection products and engineering applications are comprehensively analyzed. Finally, challenges and future directions for intelligent and multimodal ice detection are assessed, providing guidance for accurate icing monitoring and effective ice hazard mitigation.
AB - Ice detection technologies are essential for mitigating icing hazards in energy, transportation, and other fields in cold and humid environments. This review systematically summarizes the sensing principles, performance metrics, optimization strategies, and applications of ice detection technologies. Based on the physical properties of ice, sensing technologies are classified into acoustic, optical, thermal, electrical, and mechanical, and systematically compared for their capabilities in detecting icing characteristics, including ice type, thickness, and distribution. Optical and acoustic sensors achieve accuracies of about 0.1 mm within a 13 mm detection range, whereas electrical and mechanical sensors offer accuracies of 0.2–1.0 mm within a 20 mm range. Optimization strategies focusing on structures, materials, and algorithms are examined. Representative ice detection products and engineering applications are comprehensively analyzed. Finally, challenges and future directions for intelligent and multimodal ice detection are assessed, providing guidance for accurate icing monitoring and effective ice hazard mitigation.
KW - dynamic detection
KW - ice detection sensors
KW - ice type
KW - icing characteristics
KW - intelligent ice detection
KW - multimodal sensing
KW - sensor optimization
KW - thickness measurement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105050787656
U2 - 10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103543
DO - 10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103543
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105050787656
SN - 2666-3864
VL - 7
JO - Cell Reports Physical Science
JF - Cell Reports Physical Science
IS - 10
M1 - 103543
ER -