TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparation before collaboration matters
T2 - an interactive system coupled with a four-phase pedagogy for collaborative reading
AU - Zhang, Lishan
AU - Wang, Shuwen
AU - Wu, Han
AU - Zhang, Sixv
AU - Xv, Min
AU - Liu, Lili
AU - Shu, Yan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Although existing studies explored the positive effects of social annotation for collaborative reading, they have seldom considered the preparation before collaboration as separate and explored how to scaffold the preparation. To improve the effectiveness of collaborative reading, we designed a pedagogy mode named IRIS, which is short for individual preparation, group reflection, intra-construction, and summarization. An interactive system is developed to support the conduction of the four phases. Before the class, students make annotations and can see their peers’ annotations in the system. During the class, the teacher can distribute feedback on the before-class annotations via the system to help with group reflection. Then, the student groups can use the chat function to discuss and complete in-class collaborative tasks. At last, the teacher makes the summarization based on the group submissions. We conducted a quasi-experiment and evaluated the system through descriptive data analysis and Large Language Model driven technologies. In short, we found that: (1) Group awareness during individual preparation facilitated students’ cognitive engagement. (2) Too much group awareness decreased the students’ participation during group collaboration.
AB - Although existing studies explored the positive effects of social annotation for collaborative reading, they have seldom considered the preparation before collaboration as separate and explored how to scaffold the preparation. To improve the effectiveness of collaborative reading, we designed a pedagogy mode named IRIS, which is short for individual preparation, group reflection, intra-construction, and summarization. An interactive system is developed to support the conduction of the four phases. Before the class, students make annotations and can see their peers’ annotations in the system. During the class, the teacher can distribute feedback on the before-class annotations via the system to help with group reflection. Then, the student groups can use the chat function to discuss and complete in-class collaborative tasks. At last, the teacher makes the summarization based on the group submissions. We conducted a quasi-experiment and evaluated the system through descriptive data analysis and Large Language Model driven technologies. In short, we found that: (1) Group awareness during individual preparation facilitated students’ cognitive engagement. (2) Too much group awareness decreased the students’ participation during group collaboration.
KW - Social annotation
KW - classroom teaching
KW - collaborative reading
KW - human–computer collaboration
KW - individual preparation
KW - large language model
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002958253
U2 - 10.1080/10494820.2025.2491628
DO - 10.1080/10494820.2025.2491628
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002958253
SN - 1049-4820
VL - 33
SP - 6102
EP - 6123
JO - Interactive Learning Environments
JF - Interactive Learning Environments
IS - 10
ER -