TY - JOUR
T1 - Emissions prediction and mechanistic interpretation for sludge gasification via multi-source temporal modeling
AU - Tan, Yunfei
AU - Huang, Qiang
AU - Zhang, Huan
AU - Bai, Yuqi
AU - Wang, Xiuzhen
AU - Zhang, Kai
AU - Liu, Yingxu
AU - Xu, Weichao
AU - An, Chong
AU - Wang, Di
AU - Zhao, Qi
AU - Wan, Yiting
AU - Sun, Pengdong
AU - Qu, Shen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2026/7/8
Y1 - 2026/7/8
N2 - Sludge gasification technology has emerged as a promising method for sludge treatment, offering significant advancements in resource recovery, pollution reduction and carbon mitigation. However, the generated air pollutants limit the widespread adoption of this technology. We construct a timeline-based framework using actual production data with minute-level resolution. This framework integrates historical emission concentrations, operational parameters (e.g., temperature, pH), input materials (e.g., gasifying agents, steam), as well as predetermined operational settings and inputs (e.g., steam flow rate, gasification agent pressure and fan frequency) to construct multi-source features, while constantly rolling the lookback and forecasting window to dynamically predict the SO2 concentrations, oxygen content and particulate matter. On this basis, we systematically evaluate four machine learning models and four deep learning models using the Python-based Darts time series library, and use interpretability including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) in conjunction with process knowledge to analyze the underlying causes of SO2 fluctuations. The results suggest that model performance is closely related to the generation mechanisms of pollutants: TiDE performs optimally in predicting SO2, which has strong nonlinearity and hysteresis characteristics, while the timeline-based Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model demonstrates robust performance across multi-tasks. Additionally, the gasifier outlet temperature, pressure and steam flow rate are key factors for SO2 fluctuation, with their effects exhibiting a lag window of 5–8 min. Notably, the synergistic effect of low steam flow rate (<300 kg/h) and high outlet pressure (>4.0 kPa) contribute to a steep increase in SO2. By integrating data science with process mechanisms, this study aims to provide accurate and reliable decision support for proactive control and parameter optimization, thus enhance the environmental friendliness and economic feasibility of sludge gasification.
AB - Sludge gasification technology has emerged as a promising method for sludge treatment, offering significant advancements in resource recovery, pollution reduction and carbon mitigation. However, the generated air pollutants limit the widespread adoption of this technology. We construct a timeline-based framework using actual production data with minute-level resolution. This framework integrates historical emission concentrations, operational parameters (e.g., temperature, pH), input materials (e.g., gasifying agents, steam), as well as predetermined operational settings and inputs (e.g., steam flow rate, gasification agent pressure and fan frequency) to construct multi-source features, while constantly rolling the lookback and forecasting window to dynamically predict the SO2 concentrations, oxygen content and particulate matter. On this basis, we systematically evaluate four machine learning models and four deep learning models using the Python-based Darts time series library, and use interpretability including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) in conjunction with process knowledge to analyze the underlying causes of SO2 fluctuations. The results suggest that model performance is closely related to the generation mechanisms of pollutants: TiDE performs optimally in predicting SO2, which has strong nonlinearity and hysteresis characteristics, while the timeline-based Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model demonstrates robust performance across multi-tasks. Additionally, the gasifier outlet temperature, pressure and steam flow rate are key factors for SO2 fluctuation, with their effects exhibiting a lag window of 5–8 min. Notably, the synergistic effect of low steam flow rate (<300 kg/h) and high outlet pressure (>4.0 kPa) contribute to a steep increase in SO2. By integrating data science with process mechanisms, this study aims to provide accurate and reliable decision support for proactive control and parameter optimization, thus enhance the environmental friendliness and economic feasibility of sludge gasification.
KW - Hysteretic effect
KW - Mechanism interpretation
KW - Proactive control
KW - Sludge gasification
KW - Timeline-based framework
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042507943
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148812
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148812
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105042507943
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 571
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 148812
ER -