TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrically driven composite phase change materials for latent thermal energy storage in localized space heating
T2 - Progress, challenges, and prospects
AU - Khan, Sheher Yar
AU - Ali, Haider
AU - Mazhar, Abdur Rehman
AU - Ji, Wenjie
AU - Wang, Jihong
AU - Li, Yongliang
AU - Kumar, Mahesh
AU - Shen, Yongliang
AU - Sohrabi, Arvin
AU - Saad ul Haq, Muhammad
AU - Karim, Annas
AU - Liu, Shuli
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - Electrically charged phase change materials (PCMs) provide high energy-density, solutions for localized space heating, and reducing peak electricity demand, and provide alternative against power disruptions. This review consolidates a distinct contribution compared with previous PCM–TES studies by consolidating recent advancements, identifying challenges, and outlining strategies specifically for electrically powered latent TES. Key challenges exist at both material and system levels, the challenges related to materials include trade-offs in composite composition required to overcome inherent thermophysical limitations, which directly affect performance long-term reliability. Selecting melting points that align with seasonal and daily heating demand as well as electrical duty cycles remains challenging, further restricting adoption, consideration of material source origin to assess economic and environmental viability through a 4E perspective. System-level barriers include inefficient encapsulation strategies, trade-offs between compactness and heat transfer, and the lack of adaptive control systems integrating occupancy patterns, ambient conditions, and variable electricity pricing. Quantitative trends from recent studies show that electrically driven PCM and composite PCM (CPCM) heaters can reduce peak electricity demand below 10%, achieve 1.7 times higher thermal storage than conventional TES based on sensible heating, and lower operating costs by approximately 15%. Cascaded latent heat storage using multiple PCMs with staggered melting points delivers 5–14% higher storage capacity and up to 15% exergy gains over single-PCM systems. Optimized heat exchanger and container geometries further reduce melting time by up to 28%, improve cycle-level energy savings by over 2.5 kWh, and enable cumulative savings of hundreds of kWh over repeated charge–discharge cycles.
AB - Electrically charged phase change materials (PCMs) provide high energy-density, solutions for localized space heating, and reducing peak electricity demand, and provide alternative against power disruptions. This review consolidates a distinct contribution compared with previous PCM–TES studies by consolidating recent advancements, identifying challenges, and outlining strategies specifically for electrically powered latent TES. Key challenges exist at both material and system levels, the challenges related to materials include trade-offs in composite composition required to overcome inherent thermophysical limitations, which directly affect performance long-term reliability. Selecting melting points that align with seasonal and daily heating demand as well as electrical duty cycles remains challenging, further restricting adoption, consideration of material source origin to assess economic and environmental viability through a 4E perspective. System-level barriers include inefficient encapsulation strategies, trade-offs between compactness and heat transfer, and the lack of adaptive control systems integrating occupancy patterns, ambient conditions, and variable electricity pricing. Quantitative trends from recent studies show that electrically driven PCM and composite PCM (CPCM) heaters can reduce peak electricity demand below 10%, achieve 1.7 times higher thermal storage than conventional TES based on sensible heating, and lower operating costs by approximately 15%. Cascaded latent heat storage using multiple PCMs with staggered melting points delivers 5–14% higher storage capacity and up to 15% exergy gains over single-PCM systems. Optimized heat exchanger and container geometries further reduce melting time by up to 28%, improve cycle-level energy savings by over 2.5 kWh, and enable cumulative savings of hundreds of kWh over repeated charge–discharge cycles.
KW - Electrification of space heating
KW - Latent thermal energy storage
KW - PCM encapsulation strategies
KW - Phase change material
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105029441050
U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2026.116739
DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2026.116739
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105029441050
SN - 1364-0321
VL - 231
JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
M1 - 116739
ER -