TY - GEN
T1 - DEA based multiple criteria evaluation and the cross efficiency method for units ranking
AU - Wang, Ke
AU - Wei, Fa Jie
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Data envelopment analysis (DEA) method was originally designed to evaluate the efficiency of decision making units (DMUs), and it classifies the units merely into two dichotomic groups: efficient and inefficient ones. The purpose of the paper is to combine the multiple criteria evaluation problem with DEA and to fully rank the evaluation units from the most efficient to the least efficient ones as classified by DEA. In this paper we propose a new cross efficiency DEA based model for multiple criteria evaluation. The method could solve multiple criteria evaluation problem, which includes three types of index (cost, benefit, and fixed), and provide a full ranking of the efficient and inefficient units based on the cross efficiency score. Two types of secondary goal formulations (aggressive and benevolent) are introduced in this cross efficiency method in order to deal with the non uniqueness of the optimal solution issue. We compare the performances of aggressive, benevolent, and arbitrary cross efficiency models with that of the simple efficiency model and come to a conclusion that the cross efficiency model is a good surrogate for the simple efficiency model in multiple criteria evaluation, and the aggressive cross efficiency model is better than the arbitrary one. We also demonstrate these methods for evaluation and full ranking through an example.
AB - Data envelopment analysis (DEA) method was originally designed to evaluate the efficiency of decision making units (DMUs), and it classifies the units merely into two dichotomic groups: efficient and inefficient ones. The purpose of the paper is to combine the multiple criteria evaluation problem with DEA and to fully rank the evaluation units from the most efficient to the least efficient ones as classified by DEA. In this paper we propose a new cross efficiency DEA based model for multiple criteria evaluation. The method could solve multiple criteria evaluation problem, which includes three types of index (cost, benefit, and fixed), and provide a full ranking of the efficient and inefficient units based on the cross efficiency score. Two types of secondary goal formulations (aggressive and benevolent) are introduced in this cross efficiency method in order to deal with the non uniqueness of the optimal solution issue. We compare the performances of aggressive, benevolent, and arbitrary cross efficiency models with that of the simple efficiency model and come to a conclusion that the cross efficiency model is a good surrogate for the simple efficiency model in multiple criteria evaluation, and the aggressive cross efficiency model is better than the arbitrary one. We also demonstrate these methods for evaluation and full ranking through an example.
KW - Cross efficiency
KW - Data envelopment analysis
KW - Multiple criteria evaluation
KW - Ranking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57649153136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICMSE.2008.4668910
DO - 10.1109/ICMSE.2008.4668910
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:57649153136
SN - 9781424423873
T3 - 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings, ICMSE
SP - 161
EP - 166
BT - 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings, ICMSE
T2 - 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference, ICMSE
Y2 - 10 September 2008 through 12 September 2008
ER -