TY - JOUR
T1 - Colorimetric correction of electrocatalytic urea quantification
AU - Shan, Tianshang
AU - Rong, Hongpan
AU - Zhuang, Zechao
AU - Yang, Jiarui
AU - Li, Shenghua
AU - Zhang, Jiatao
AU - Pang, Siping
AU - Wang, Dingsheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.
PY - 2026/12
Y1 - 2026/12
N2 - As a feasible path for the green and sustainable synthesis of urea, electrochemical C-N coupling reactions have attracted considerable attention. To achieve high catalytic coupling performances, efficient electrocatalysts are indispensable. Notably, precise quantification of urea serves as the cornerstone for assessing catalyst performance. Urease can catalyze the decomposition of urea into ammonium (NH4+), and this process is widely used in the quantification of electrocatalytic urea synthesis via calculating the increase of NH4+ concentration. Unexpectedly, NH4+ impurities are present in all four commercial ureases, posing a substantial risk of false-positive of urea concentration. Even when using the urease with the lowest content of NH4+ impurity, the false-positive production rate of urea can exceed most reported performance thus far in electrocatalytic urea synthesis. Therefore, we recommend a simple procedure that adds NH4+ impurity of commercial ureases as a subtractive term into the equation of conventional urease method for reliable urea quantification. The accuracy of the refined urease method is validated in previously reported CO2/NO3− system, thereby ensuring reliable development in urea electrosynthesis.
AB - As a feasible path for the green and sustainable synthesis of urea, electrochemical C-N coupling reactions have attracted considerable attention. To achieve high catalytic coupling performances, efficient electrocatalysts are indispensable. Notably, precise quantification of urea serves as the cornerstone for assessing catalyst performance. Urease can catalyze the decomposition of urea into ammonium (NH4+), and this process is widely used in the quantification of electrocatalytic urea synthesis via calculating the increase of NH4+ concentration. Unexpectedly, NH4+ impurities are present in all four commercial ureases, posing a substantial risk of false-positive of urea concentration. Even when using the urease with the lowest content of NH4+ impurity, the false-positive production rate of urea can exceed most reported performance thus far in electrocatalytic urea synthesis. Therefore, we recommend a simple procedure that adds NH4+ impurity of commercial ureases as a subtractive term into the equation of conventional urease method for reliable urea quantification. The accuracy of the refined urease method is validated in previously reported CO2/NO3− system, thereby ensuring reliable development in urea electrosynthesis.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105047936512
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-026-75519-2
DO - 10.1038/s41467-026-75519-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 42443185
AN - SCOPUS:105047936512
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 17
JO - Nature Communications
JF - Nature Communications
IS - 1
M1 - 8604
ER -