TY - GEN
T1 - Care and Learning in Human-Robot Interaction
T2 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, ARSO 2025
AU - Kamide, H.
AU - Arai, T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study extends the concept of Human-Object Interaction (HOI) to Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), examining how care (attentive handling of robots) and learning (gaining insights through interactions) relate to users' wellbeing. A survey of 397 robot users in Japan analyzed the relationships between usage frequency, care, learning, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Results showed that more frequent use was associated with greater care and learning. Care was linked to lower loneliness, while learning was associated with higher life satisfaction, suggesting distinct psychological effects. Although robot type did not affect care or well-being, learning was higher for communicative and mobile robots than for cleaning robots. However, the study did not fully address differences among robot types or clarify distinctions between robots and static objects. Moreover, participants were limited to current robot owners, possibly biasing results. Future research should examine how robot characteristics influence psychological processes and expand to broader, more diverse populations to better understand human-robot coexistence.
AB - This study extends the concept of Human-Object Interaction (HOI) to Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), examining how care (attentive handling of robots) and learning (gaining insights through interactions) relate to users' wellbeing. A survey of 397 robot users in Japan analyzed the relationships between usage frequency, care, learning, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Results showed that more frequent use was associated with greater care and learning. Care was linked to lower loneliness, while learning was associated with higher life satisfaction, suggesting distinct psychological effects. Although robot type did not affect care or well-being, learning was higher for communicative and mobile robots than for cleaning robots. However, the study did not fully address differences among robot types or clarify distinctions between robots and static objects. Moreover, participants were limited to current robot owners, possibly biasing results. Future research should examine how robot characteristics influence psychological processes and expand to broader, more diverse populations to better understand human-robot coexistence.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015882053
U2 - 10.1109/ARSO64737.2025.11125000
DO - 10.1109/ARSO64737.2025.11125000
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105015882053
T3 - Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, ARSO
SP - 287
EP - 292
BT - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, ARSO 2025
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 17 July 2025 through 19 July 2025
ER -