TY - JOUR
T1 - An investigation of interface conditions inherent in detached-eddy simulation methods
AU - Zhou, L.
AU - Zhao, R.
AU - Yuan, W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - The interfaces where the RANS modeled areas match the LES resolved regions are comparatively investigated with regard to the four popular detached-eddy simulation (DES) variants; namely, one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) and two-equations Menter's SST background DES methods (SA-DES and SST-DES), as well as their respective delayed versions (SA-DDES and SST-DDES). The comparisons are aimed at further interpretation of their performance differences under various flows. Although all four DES variants can consistently predict results in fully separated circular cylinder flow, the SST-DES interface is like the SA-DDES interface around the wall, which indicates that, in this case, the shielding function fd_cor of SST-DDES is redundant. Moreover, the recalibrated fd_cor for SST-DDES is found to preserve double the boundary-layer thicknesses in the flat-plate flow, and shown to be too conservative to resolve the unsteady vortex in the cavity-ramp flow. On the other hand, SA-DDES with the shielding function fd shows an advantage by properly balancing the need of reserving the RANS modeled regions for wall boundary layers and generating the unsteady turbulent structures in detached areas.
AB - The interfaces where the RANS modeled areas match the LES resolved regions are comparatively investigated with regard to the four popular detached-eddy simulation (DES) variants; namely, one-equation Spalart–Allmaras (SA) and two-equations Menter's SST background DES methods (SA-DES and SST-DES), as well as their respective delayed versions (SA-DDES and SST-DDES). The comparisons are aimed at further interpretation of their performance differences under various flows. Although all four DES variants can consistently predict results in fully separated circular cylinder flow, the SST-DES interface is like the SA-DDES interface around the wall, which indicates that, in this case, the shielding function fd_cor of SST-DDES is redundant. Moreover, the recalibrated fd_cor for SST-DDES is found to preserve double the boundary-layer thicknesses in the flat-plate flow, and shown to be too conservative to resolve the unsteady vortex in the cavity-ramp flow. On the other hand, SA-DDES with the shielding function fd shows an advantage by properly balancing the need of reserving the RANS modeled regions for wall boundary layers and generating the unsteady turbulent structures in detached areas.
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
KW - Detached-eddy simulation
KW - Separated flow
KW - Shielding function
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85041486486
U2 - 10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85041486486
SN - 1270-9638
VL - 74
SP - 46
EP - 55
JO - Aerospace Science and Technology
JF - Aerospace Science and Technology
ER -