A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection

Qiang Hui Xu; Cheng Zan; De Sheng Ma; Lin Shi

A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection

Qiang Hui Xu
, Cheng Zan
, De Sheng Ma
, Lin Shi^*

^*此作品的通讯作者

Tsinghua University
China National Petroleum Corporation

科研成果: 期刊稿件 › 文章 › 同行评审

摘要

Reservoir energy efficiencies during crude oil recovery were comparatively studied between in situ combustion (ISC) and moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation (MICO). Fuel consumptions were evaluated by local energy balance of reaction zones, and energy loss was obtained by numerically studying dimensionless thermal conduction problems with variable boundary conditions. Combined with recovery-volume burned method, oil production and energy utilization could be evaluated in an inverted five-spot reservoir. Narrow energy to oil production ratios (EOR) were studied respectively. The results showed the EOR of MICO is 42%~47% less than that of ISC.

源语言	英语
页（从-至）	1164-1169
页数	6
期刊	Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
卷	36
期	6
出版状态	已出版 - 1 6月 2015
已对外发布	是

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标：

可持续发展目标 7 经济适用的清洁能源

其它文件与链接

链接到 Scopus 的出版物

引用此

@article{5cc1f087e9a1499cb01318c1eb977c54,

title = "A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection",

abstract = "Reservoir energy efficiencies during crude oil recovery were comparatively studied between in situ combustion (ISC) and moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation (MICO). Fuel consumptions were evaluated by local energy balance of reaction zones, and energy loss was obtained by numerically studying dimensionless thermal conduction problems with variable boundary conditions. Combined with recovery-volume burned method, oil production and energy utilization could be evaluated in an inverted five-spot reservoir. Narrow energy to oil production ratios (EOR) were studied respectively. The results showed the EOR of MICO is 42\%\textasciitilde{}47\% less than that of ISC.",

keywords = "Energy efficiency, Heat loss, In-situ combustion, Moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation, Recoveryvolume burned method",

author = "Xu, \{Qiang Hui\} and Cheng Zan and Ma, \{De Sheng\} and Lin Shi",

year = "2015",

month = jun,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "1164--1169",

journal = "Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics",

issn = "0253-231X",

publisher = "Science Press",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection

AU - Xu, Qiang Hui

AU - Zan, Cheng

AU - Ma, De Sheng

AU - Shi, Lin

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Reservoir energy efficiencies during crude oil recovery were comparatively studied between in situ combustion (ISC) and moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation (MICO). Fuel consumptions were evaluated by local energy balance of reaction zones, and energy loss was obtained by numerically studying dimensionless thermal conduction problems with variable boundary conditions. Combined with recovery-volume burned method, oil production and energy utilization could be evaluated in an inverted five-spot reservoir. Narrow energy to oil production ratios (EOR) were studied respectively. The results showed the EOR of MICO is 42%~47% less than that of ISC.

AB - Reservoir energy efficiencies during crude oil recovery were comparatively studied between in situ combustion (ISC) and moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation (MICO). Fuel consumptions were evaluated by local energy balance of reaction zones, and energy loss was obtained by numerically studying dimensionless thermal conduction problems with variable boundary conditions. Combined with recovery-volume burned method, oil production and energy utilization could be evaluated in an inverted five-spot reservoir. Narrow energy to oil production ratios (EOR) were studied respectively. The results showed the EOR of MICO is 42%~47% less than that of ISC.

KW - Energy efficiency

KW - Heat loss

KW - In-situ combustion

KW - Moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation

KW - Recoveryvolume burned method

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84969263219

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84969263219

SN - 0253-231X

VL - 36

SP - 1164

EP - 1169

JO - Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics

JF - Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics

IS - 6

ER -

A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection

摘要

联合国可持续发展目标

其它文件与链接

指纹

引用此