Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“To work, or not to work, that is the question”–Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism

  • S. A. Ruhle*
  • , H. Breitsohl
  • , E. Aboagye
  • , V. Baba
  • , C. Biron
  • , C. Correia Leal
  • , C. Dietz
  • , A. I. Ferreira
  • , J. Gerich
  • , G. Johns
  • , M. Karanika-Murray
  • , D. Lohaus
  • , A. Løkke
  • , S. L. Lopes
  • , L. F. Martinez
  • , M. Miraglia
  • , B. Muschalla
  • , U. Poethke
  • , N. Sarwat
  • , H. Schade
  • C. Steidelmüller, S. Vinberg, Z. Whysall, T. Yang
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • University of Klagenfurt
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • McMaster University
  • Université Laval
  • University Institute of Lisbon
  • Leipzig University
  • Johannes Kepler University Linz
  • Concordia University
  • University of British Columbia
  • Nottingham Trent University
  • Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences
  • Aarhus University
  • NOVA University Lisbon
  • University of Liverpool
  • Technical University of Braunschweig
  • TU Dortmund University
  • Bahauddin Zakariya University
  • Chemnitz University of Technology
  • Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
  • Mid Sweden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This position paper brings together recent and emerging developments in the field of presenteeism. A critical synthesis of the evidence is needed due to persisting conceptual and methodological challenges as well as the increased volume of research in the field. This paper integrates emerging evidence and critical thinking into three areas: (1) concept, (2) measurement and methodological issues, and (3) the context of presenteeism. First, due to the variety of existing definitions, competing understandings, as well as the notion of positive presenteeism, it is important to reconsider the notion of presenteeism. Second, it is important to reflect on the measurement of the act of presenteeism and the productivity loss associated with that. Third, following the call to investigate presenteeism in specific contexts, it is important to explain the social, occupational, cross-cultural aspects, as well as the contemporary workplace changes. Based on this critical synthesis, we conclude by identifying recommendations for future research on presenteeism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-363
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2020

Keywords

  • Presenteeism
  • absenteeism
  • context
  • measurement
  • position paper

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“To work, or not to work, that is the question”–Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this