Solely economic mitigation strategy suggests upward revision of nationally determined contributions

  • Pu Yang
  • , Zhifu Mi*
  • , Yun Fei Yao
  • , Yun Fei Cao
  • , D'Maris M. Coffman
  • , Lan Cui Liu
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The use of equity principles to review the nationally determined contributions (NDCs) is critical to facilitating more ambitious climate actions. However, disagreement over the equity principles persists. We instead treat emission reduction as a solely economic behavior motivated by avoiding future economic damage from climate change. Assuming no international cooperation, we provide a solely economic mitigation pathway to review national climate pledges until 2100. Using the value in 2030 to review the NDCs, we find that the NDCs of China, the USA, and the EU are 1.5, 1.4, and 0.9 respective GtCO2eq lower than their solely economic emission levels, whereas India commits 3.8 GtCO2eq more than its solely economic emission level. We also propose an equal-effort cooperation scenario toward 2°C where each country reduces emissions by 28% of their solely economic levels in 2030. Through exploration of the economic trade-offs, our results suggest that more ambitious NDCs are urgently needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1150-1162
Number of pages13
JournalOne Earth
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Paris Agreement
  • abatement cost
  • avoided climate damage
  • climate change
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • equity principles
  • integrated assessment model
  • nationally determined contributions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Solely economic mitigation strategy suggests upward revision of nationally determined contributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this