TY - JOUR
T1 - Small-Signal Modeling and Comparisons of the Pulse Frequency Modulation and Time Shift Control for the LLC Converters
AU - Guo, Zhiqiang
AU - Huang, Zhijie
AU - Chen, Zhongyuan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This article describes a new method for the small-signal modeling of the LLC converter based on time-domain analysis. The time-domain expressions of the state trajectory are transformed to the first-order of Tylor's expressions, which can achieve the linearization of the trajectory expressions. The state space formulas and transfer functions in pulse frequency modulation (PFM) are derived from the linearization expressions, where the state variables include the initial resonant current and resonant capacitor voltage in a switching period besides the output voltage. This method can be easily extended to the small signal modeling of the LLC converter in time-shift control (TSC). The reason why the TSC is regarded as a current-mode control is analytically explained in this article. The comparison of the frequency response in the PFM and TSC demonstrates the high bandwidth and high phase margin in the TSC, which indicates the LLC converter with the TSC can achieve a good dynamic response. The closed-loop PI controller is designed based on the small-signal model, and load step experiments demonstrate that the converter exhibits better dynamic response in the TSC compared to the PFM.
AB - This article describes a new method for the small-signal modeling of the LLC converter based on time-domain analysis. The time-domain expressions of the state trajectory are transformed to the first-order of Tylor's expressions, which can achieve the linearization of the trajectory expressions. The state space formulas and transfer functions in pulse frequency modulation (PFM) are derived from the linearization expressions, where the state variables include the initial resonant current and resonant capacitor voltage in a switching period besides the output voltage. This method can be easily extended to the small signal modeling of the LLC converter in time-shift control (TSC). The reason why the TSC is regarded as a current-mode control is analytically explained in this article. The comparison of the frequency response in the PFM and TSC demonstrates the high bandwidth and high phase margin in the TSC, which indicates the LLC converter with the TSC can achieve a good dynamic response. The closed-loop PI controller is designed based on the small-signal model, and load step experiments demonstrate that the converter exhibits better dynamic response in the TSC compared to the PFM.
KW - LLC converter
KW - pulse frequency modulation (PFM)
KW - small-signal analysis
KW - time-domain analysis
KW - time-shift control (TSC)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85204435234
U2 - 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3463956
DO - 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3463956
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85204435234
SN - 0885-8993
VL - 40
SP - 526
EP - 539
JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
IS - 1
ER -