[Scoring formula research and equivalence evaluation of mandarin quick speech-in-noise test materials in mainland China]

Rui Zhou; Hua Zhang; Shuo Wang; Jing Chen; Peng Zhang

[Scoring formula research and equivalence evaluation of mandarin quick speech-in-noise test materials in mainland China]

Rui Zhou
, Hua Zhang
, Shuo Wang
, Jing Chen
, Peng Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the scoring formula and evaluate the lists equivalence of Mandarin Quick Speech-in-Noise (M-Quick SIN) test materials in mainland China, and for standardizing our research.

METHOD: Double 39 subjects with normal hearing were participated in part one and part two of our experiments, respectively. 20, 18, 15, 13, 10, 8, 5, 3, 0, -2, -5, -7, -10 dB SNR were presented in part one; and 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, -5 dB SNR were presented in part two. The results were analyzed by SPSS 13.0.

RESULT: SNR-50 was -2.24 dB SNR and "SNR loss = 24.5--correct words" was defined as the scoring formula. All the 13 lists had the e quivalent difficulty.

CONCLUSION: Defined "SNR loss = 24.5--correct words" as the scoring formula of M-Quick SIN, and the 13 lists had better difficulty equivalence, which could be used in our further clinical research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1104-1108
Number of pages	5
Journal	Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery
Volume	28
Issue number	15
Publication status	Published - 1 Aug 2014
Externally published	Yes

Cite this

@article{c0228bc033a6478a8e1f07015c642c04,

title = "[Scoring formula research and equivalence evaluation of mandarin quick speech-in-noise test materials in mainland China]",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To discuss the scoring formula and evaluate the lists equivalence of Mandarin Quick Speech-in-Noise (M-Quick SIN) test materials in mainland China, and for standardizing our research.METHOD: Double 39 subjects with normal hearing were participated in part one and part two of our experiments, respectively. 20, 18, 15, 13, 10, 8, 5, 3, 0, -2, -5, -7, -10 dB SNR were presented in part one; and 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, -5 dB SNR were presented in part two. The results were analyzed by SPSS 13.0.RESULT: SNR-50 was -2.24 dB SNR and {"}SNR loss = 24.5--correct words{"} was defined as the scoring formula. All the 13 lists had the e quivalent difficulty.CONCLUSION: Defined {"}SNR loss = 24.5--correct words{"} as the scoring formula of M-Quick SIN, and the 13 lists had better difficulty equivalence, which could be used in our further clinical research.",

author = "Rui Zhou and Hua Zhang and Shuo Wang and Jing Chen and Peng Zhang",

year = "2014",

month = aug,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "1104--1108",

journal = "Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery",

issn = "1001-1781",

publisher = "Tong ji yi ke da xue Fu shu xie he yi yuan",

number = "15",

}

[Scoring formula research and equivalence evaluation of mandarin quick speech-in-noise test materials in mainland China]. / Zhou, Rui; Zhang, Hua; Wang, Shuo et al.
In: Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery, Vol. 28, No. 15, 01.08.2014, p. 1104-1108.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Scoring formula research and equivalence evaluation of mandarin quick speech-in-noise test materials in mainland China]

AU - Zhou, Rui

AU - Zhang, Hua

AU - Wang, Shuo

AU - Chen, Jing

AU - Zhang, Peng

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To discuss the scoring formula and evaluate the lists equivalence of Mandarin Quick Speech-in-Noise (M-Quick SIN) test materials in mainland China, and for standardizing our research.METHOD: Double 39 subjects with normal hearing were participated in part one and part two of our experiments, respectively. 20, 18, 15, 13, 10, 8, 5, 3, 0, -2, -5, -7, -10 dB SNR were presented in part one; and 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, -5 dB SNR were presented in part two. The results were analyzed by SPSS 13.0.RESULT: SNR-50 was -2.24 dB SNR and "SNR loss = 24.5--correct words" was defined as the scoring formula. All the 13 lists had the e quivalent difficulty.CONCLUSION: Defined "SNR loss = 24.5--correct words" as the scoring formula of M-Quick SIN, and the 13 lists had better difficulty equivalence, which could be used in our further clinical research.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To discuss the scoring formula and evaluate the lists equivalence of Mandarin Quick Speech-in-Noise (M-Quick SIN) test materials in mainland China, and for standardizing our research.METHOD: Double 39 subjects with normal hearing were participated in part one and part two of our experiments, respectively. 20, 18, 15, 13, 10, 8, 5, 3, 0, -2, -5, -7, -10 dB SNR were presented in part one; and 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, -5 dB SNR were presented in part two. The results were analyzed by SPSS 13.0.RESULT: SNR-50 was -2.24 dB SNR and "SNR loss = 24.5--correct words" was defined as the scoring formula. All the 13 lists had the e quivalent difficulty.CONCLUSION: Defined "SNR loss = 24.5--correct words" as the scoring formula of M-Quick SIN, and the 13 lists had better difficulty equivalence, which could be used in our further clinical research.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84922281695

M3 - Article

C2 - 25322594

AN - SCOPUS:84922281695

SN - 1001-1781

VL - 28

SP - 1104

EP - 1108

JO - Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery

JF - Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery

IS - 15

ER -

[Scoring formula research and equivalence evaluation of mandarin quick speech-in-noise test materials in mainland China]

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this