TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of martensitic transformation start temperature of steel using thermodynamic model, empirical formulas, and machine learning models
AU - Lin, Zidong
AU - Wang, Jiaqi
AU - Zhou, Chenxv
AU - Sun, Zhen
AU - Wang, Yanlong
AU - Yu, Xinghua
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Three methods are used to predict the martensitic transformation start temperature (Ms ) of steel. Based on the database containing 832 compositions and corresponding Ms data, prediction models are built, modified, and trained. Firstly, Ms was re-calculated by establishing a thermodynamic model to link the martensitic transformation driving force (Gibbs free energy difference of martensite and austenite) with resistance (elastic strain energy, plastic strain energy, interface energy, and shearing energy). Secondly, the existing Ms data is cleaned and re-predicted using traditional empirical formulas within different composition application ranges. Thirdly, four different algorithms in machine learning including random forest, k nearest neighbor, linear regression, and decision tree are trained to predict 832 new Ms values. By comparing the Ms results re-predicted by the mentioned three methods with the original Ms values, the accuracy is evaluated to identify the optimal prediction model.
AB - Three methods are used to predict the martensitic transformation start temperature (Ms ) of steel. Based on the database containing 832 compositions and corresponding Ms data, prediction models are built, modified, and trained. Firstly, Ms was re-calculated by establishing a thermodynamic model to link the martensitic transformation driving force (Gibbs free energy difference of martensite and austenite) with resistance (elastic strain energy, plastic strain energy, interface energy, and shearing energy). Secondly, the existing Ms data is cleaned and re-predicted using traditional empirical formulas within different composition application ranges. Thirdly, four different algorithms in machine learning including random forest, k nearest neighbor, linear regression, and decision tree are trained to predict 832 new Ms values. By comparing the Ms results re-predicted by the mentioned three methods with the original Ms values, the accuracy is evaluated to identify the optimal prediction model.
KW - empirical formula
KW - M temperature prediction
KW - machine learning
KW - steel
KW - thermodynamic model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198038537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-651X/ad54e0
DO - 10.1088/1361-651X/ad54e0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85198038537
SN - 0965-0393
VL - 32
JO - Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
JF - Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
IS - 6
M1 - 065016
ER -