Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance comparison of DFT-spread and pre-equalization for 8 × 244.2-Gb/s PDM-16QAM-OFDM

  • Hunan University
  • ZTE Corporation
  • Fudan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we experimentally compared the performance of discrete-Fourier-transform spread (DFT-spread) and pre-equalization in a 244.2-Gb/s polarization-division-multiplexed 16-ary quadrature amplitude-modulation orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (PDM-16QAM-OFDM) transmission system. The pre-equalization is effective to overcome the high-frequency power attenuation in the channel. However, the acquisition of static channel response for pre-equalization is really complicated and the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the signal after pre-equalization even becomes a little higher. The DFT-spread can be applied to simultaneously resist high-frequency power attenuation and reduce the PAPR of OFDM signal. The experimental results also show that one band DFT-spread demonstrates the best narrow optical filtering tolerance. The transmission distance for 8 × 244.2-Gb/s wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM) PDM-16QAM-OFDM at the soft-decision forward-error correction threshold of 2.4 × 10-2 is 2 × 420 km based on pre-equalization, while extended to over 3 × 420 km based on one band DFT-spread, which well illustrates one band DFT-spread is more efficient for high-bandwidth coherent WDM-OFDM system.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6980462
Pages (from-to)227-233
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Lightwave Technology
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)
  • discrete-Fouriertransform spread (DFT-spread)
  • narrow optical filtering tolerance
  • pre-equalization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance comparison of DFT-spread and pre-equalization for 8 × 244.2-Gb/s PDM-16QAM-OFDM'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this