TY - JOUR
T1 - On linear/nonlinear active disturbance rejection switching control
AU - Li, Jie
AU - Qi, Xiao Hui
AU - Xia, Yuan Qing
AU - Gao, Zhi Qiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 Acta Automatica Sinica. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Nonlinear active disturbance rejection control (NLADRC) is superior to linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) in tracking precision, anti-disturbance ability, and so on. However, there are difficulties in parameter tuning, stability analysis, performance analysis, etc, which inhibits its application. Therefore, LADRC is more popular in engineering applications. This paper presents a linear/nonlinear active disturbance rejection switching control method, which has both of the advantages of LADRC and NLADRC, and solves the problems of parameter tuning, stability analysis, etc. Firstly, the characteristics of LADRC and NLADRC are presented, and then a switching strategy is proposed. Secondly, a simple practical parameter tuning method is provided. Thirdly, the stability is analyzed through Routh criterion and Popov criterion. Simulations show that the switching control method is superior to both LADRC and NLADRC in tracking precision and anti-disturbance. The proposed method fully demonstrates the advantages of nonlinear functions in occasions when high tracking precision and strong anti-disturbance ability are needed, and is hopefully to be adopted in practical application.
AB - Nonlinear active disturbance rejection control (NLADRC) is superior to linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) in tracking precision, anti-disturbance ability, and so on. However, there are difficulties in parameter tuning, stability analysis, performance analysis, etc, which inhibits its application. Therefore, LADRC is more popular in engineering applications. This paper presents a linear/nonlinear active disturbance rejection switching control method, which has both of the advantages of LADRC and NLADRC, and solves the problems of parameter tuning, stability analysis, etc. Firstly, the characteristics of LADRC and NLADRC are presented, and then a switching strategy is proposed. Secondly, a simple practical parameter tuning method is provided. Thirdly, the stability is analyzed through Routh criterion and Popov criterion. Simulations show that the switching control method is superior to both LADRC and NLADRC in tracking precision and anti-disturbance. The proposed method fully demonstrates the advantages of nonlinear functions in occasions when high tracking precision and strong anti-disturbance ability are needed, and is hopefully to be adopted in practical application.
KW - Active disturbance rejection control
KW - Parameter tuning
KW - Performance analysis
KW - Stability analysis
KW - Switching control
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84960350966
U2 - 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150338
DO - 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150338
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84960350966
SN - 0254-4156
VL - 42
SP - 202
EP - 212
JO - Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica
JF - Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica
IS - 2
ER -