Material constitutive modeling over a wide strain rate range by integration of cylinder and cap sample SHPB tests

Tongyu Liu, Wenxiang Zhao, Lijing Xie*, Engao Peng, Feinong Gao

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, the constitutive modelling method to cover a wide range of strain rate is studied by integrating the cylinder and cap sample SHPB (Split Hopkinson pressure bar) tests. In order to compensate the errors in the stain calculation for cap sample SHPB tests, a correct factor function of the temperature and strain rate is first established. Afterwards, a unification method is proposed to transform both the shear stress and tensile/compressive stresses in hot compression, quasi-static tension, cap and cylinder sample SHPB tests to VON MISES stress. In this way, all the data from different mechanical tests are used for data fitting the material constitutive models over a wide strain rate range. In the consideration of the coupling of thermal softening and strain rate hardening effects, both the classical and modified Johnson-Cook (J-C) constitutive models are developed for AISI9310 steel and ZL702A aluminum alloy. In addition, constitute modelling by means of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models is explored. Two ANN (Artificial Neural Network) models with 6 and 11 neurons are trained for AISI9310 steel. According to the verification and evaluation with experiments by means of direct calculation and finite element method (FEM) simulation, the modified J-C model behaves best over the entire strain rate range, and the ANN model with 6 neurons wins over 11 neurons due to its success in avoiding the overfitting risk.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105368
JournalInternational Journal of Impact Engineering
Volume204
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Artificial neural network
  • Constitutive modelling
  • FEM
  • SHPB

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Material constitutive modeling over a wide strain rate range by integration of cylinder and cap sample SHPB tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this