Land Titling: A Catalyst for Enhancing China Rural Laborers’ Mobility Intentions?

Shanshan Mou, Zhongkun Zhu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Land titling, a critical land institution reform aimed at enhancing tenure security, serves as a pivotal policy instrument to strengthen rural laborers’ mobility intentions. Leveraging a balanced panel dataset from the 2014 and 2016 China Labor-force Dynamic Survey (CLDS), this study employs a difference-in-differences (DID) model to evaluate the policy effects of the latest round of land titling on rural laborers’ mobility intentions. The results demonstrate that land titling significantly enhances rural laborers’ willingness to migrate. To ensure robustness, we incorporate individual and year fixed effects, cluster robust standard errors at the household level, and conduct multiple robustness tests, including placebo test, propensity score-matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), replacement of dependent variable, clustered adjustment, adding control variables and interaction fixed effects. Mechanism analysis reveals that land titling elevates laborers’ mobility intentions primarily by reducing land reallocation and stimulating investments in agricultural machinery. Heterogeneity analysis further identifies stronger effects in villages dominated by agricultural employment, and among middle-aged laborers. These findings highlight the nuanced role of tenure security in reshaping rural laborer dynamics and provide empirical support for optimizing land-related policies to facilitate structural transformation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number867
JournalLand
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • agricultural machinery investment
  • difference-in-differences (DID) model
  • laborers’ mobility intentions
  • land reallocation
  • land titling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Land Titling: A Catalyst for Enhancing China Rural Laborers’ Mobility Intentions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this