TY - JOUR
T1 - Industrial zero liquid discharge strategy in the water-scarce regions of China triggering the antagonism tradeoff of pollution and carbon emissions
AU - Zhang, Di
AU - Guo, Shaohua
AU - Liu, Changyong
AU - Qu, Shen
AU - Cao, Hongbin
AU - Zhao, He
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/5/25
Y1 - 2025/5/25
N2 - Due to limited water resources, zero liquid discharge is the environmental impact assessment admittance threshold for new coal chemical projects in China. However, it is unknown whether the application of zero liquid discharge technologies will actually change environmental impacts, carbon emissions, or costs. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation model was developed to analyze unintended non-synergistic of pollution and carbon emissions and to perform a cost-benefit analysis of mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies. Two zero liquid discharge and two non-zero liquid discharge processes covering mainstream brine treatment technologies of coal chemical industry in China were compared. The results showed that some mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies had unintended consequences in terms of their environmental impact, carbon footprint, and cost. The high-salinity water treatment units using evaporative crystallization are key components during coal-to-olefin water treatment methods. Because energy-intensive equipment is used to evaporate water, the processes utilizing an evaporative crystallization unit incurred nearly two times the cost, with a 24.3 %–117.4 % increase in carbon footprint, compared to those not using the unit. The benefits of salt products such as sodium chloride obtained from the evaporation process are far lower than their costs and they generate salt-containing organic pollution, which increases the environmental risks. Due to carbon neutrality goals, zero liquid discharge technologies must solve the two major problems of waste salt generation and high energy consumption. Up to 196–423 kt of carbon emissions can be eliminated by 2050 by using green energy substitutes, technological innovation, and regent reduction. This provides a direction for the future development of zero liquid discharge technologies for coal chemical industry in water-scarce regions.
AB - Due to limited water resources, zero liquid discharge is the environmental impact assessment admittance threshold for new coal chemical projects in China. However, it is unknown whether the application of zero liquid discharge technologies will actually change environmental impacts, carbon emissions, or costs. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation model was developed to analyze unintended non-synergistic of pollution and carbon emissions and to perform a cost-benefit analysis of mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies. Two zero liquid discharge and two non-zero liquid discharge processes covering mainstream brine treatment technologies of coal chemical industry in China were compared. The results showed that some mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies had unintended consequences in terms of their environmental impact, carbon footprint, and cost. The high-salinity water treatment units using evaporative crystallization are key components during coal-to-olefin water treatment methods. Because energy-intensive equipment is used to evaporate water, the processes utilizing an evaporative crystallization unit incurred nearly two times the cost, with a 24.3 %–117.4 % increase in carbon footprint, compared to those not using the unit. The benefits of salt products such as sodium chloride obtained from the evaporation process are far lower than their costs and they generate salt-containing organic pollution, which increases the environmental risks. Due to carbon neutrality goals, zero liquid discharge technologies must solve the two major problems of waste salt generation and high energy consumption. Up to 196–423 kt of carbon emissions can be eliminated by 2050 by using green energy substitutes, technological innovation, and regent reduction. This provides a direction for the future development of zero liquid discharge technologies for coal chemical industry in water-scarce regions.
KW - Carbon reduction
KW - Cost-benefit
KW - Environmental impact
KW - Resource recovery
KW - Waste salt
KW - Zero liquid discharge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003938884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145506
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145506
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003938884
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 508
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 145506
ER -