Handle Heavy Workload in Penalty-Based Machine-Type Communication: Using ResNet

Zhipeng Feng, Changhao Du*, Jianping An, Zhongshan Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although machine-type communication (MTC) will play a crucial role in massive-terminal communication in the future, existing MTC systems often overlook the impact of workload on system performance, leading to the underestimation of the effects of high workload and link retransmission in existing power allocation schemes, ultimately resulting in a deterioration of network capacity. This letter quantifies the penalty caused by retransmission and employs the penalty-weighted sum-rate (PWSR) to evaluate the system performance under different workload conditions, thus studying penalty-based MTC (pMTC) networks. Meanwhile, to obtain the optimal PWSR, we consider both computational cost and performance when designing a power scheme. The residual network (ResNet) adds skip connections on the basis of the deep neural network (DNN), which not only retains the advantages of simple structure and considerable performance but also has the advantages of fast convergence and effective mitigation of gradient vanishment. Thus, we adopt a ResNet-based scheme to allocate the power of each device in the pMTC. The numerical results indicate that under heavy workload conditions, the performance loss generated by the ResNet-based scheme is much lower than that of other investigated schemes, and the former has a better "penalty-robustness"and a lower computational complexity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706-710
Number of pages5
JournalIEEE Wireless Communications Letters
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Residual network
  • machine-type communication
  • penalty
  • power scheme
  • workload

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Handle Heavy Workload in Penalty-Based Machine-Type Communication: Using ResNet'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this