Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2035: A cross-sectional study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

Xiaoming Xie, Kuayue Zhang, Yuan Li, Yulong Li, Xinyi Li, Yi Lin, Liangqing Huang, Guihua Tian*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective This study aims to report the trends and cross-national disparities in the burden of osteoarthritis (OA) by region, age, gender, and time from 1990 to 2021, and to further project changes through 2035. Methods In this systematic analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, population survey data on osteoarthritis from 21 countries/regions and U.S. insurance claims data were used to estimate the prevalence and incidence of OA in 204 countries and regions from 1990 to 2021. The reference case definition for OA was symptomatic and radiographically confirmed osteoarthritis. Studies using definitions other than the reference, such as self-reported OA, were adjusted through a regression model to align with the reference case. The distribution of OA severity was derived from a pooled meta-analysis using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Final prevalence estimates were multiplied by disability weights to calculate years lived with disability (YLD). An Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model was used to forecast the prevalence and incidence of OA through 2035. Results In 2021, approximately 607 million (95%UI 538–671) people worldwide were affected by osteoarthritis, accounting for 7.7% of the global population. Compared to 2020, the age-standardized prevalence of OA among males is projected to increase from 5,763 per 100,000–5,922 per 100,000 by 2036, while the age-standardized prevalence among females is expected to decline slightly from 8,034 per 100,000–7,925 per 100,000. In 2021, the global age-standardized YLD rate for osteoarthritis was 244.5 (95%UI 117.06–493.11), the global age-standardized prevalence rate was 6,967.29 (95%UI 6,180.7–7,686.06), and the global age-standardized incidence rate was 535 (95%UI 472.38–591.97). In 2021, the age-standardized prevalence rate exceeded 5.5% across all regions, ranging from 5,675.8 per 100,000 (95%UI 5,001.76–6,320.8) in Southeast Asia to 8,608.63 per 100,000 (95%UI 7,674.07– 9,485.19) in high-income Asia Pacific regions. The knee was the most commonly affected joint. High BMI and metabolic risks are the only two GBD risk factors for osteoarthritis. From 1990 to 2021, the age-standardized prevalence, incidence, and YLD attributable to osteoarthritis have been on the rise, with substantial international variations across indicators. Countries with high socio-demographic index (SDI) bear a disproportionately high burden of OA, and inequalities in the burden of disease due to differences in SDI between countries have been increasing over time. Conclusions As a major public health problem, the overall global burden of OA has shown an upward trend from 1990 to 2019, including an increase in the number of cases and inequalities in distribution across the globe, which has resulted in significant health losses and economic burdens. In addition, SDI-related inequalities between countries are increasing. In this regard, national public health authorities and the World Health Organization (WHO) should work together to improve diagnosis and early treatment rates by strengthening disease awareness and education, as well as strengthening international cooperation, providing necessary medical assistance to less developed regions, and actively exploring new strategies for the prevention and treatment of OA.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0324296
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume20
Issue number5 May
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2035: A cross-sectional study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this