Abstract
Risk-taking is critical to decisions. Unfortunately, information about risk is not always available, and that the lack of information prompts people to use advice. A crucial question about using advice to deal with risk and uncertainty is how advice influences risk-taking, yet little research has investigated whether the effect of advice-following on risk-taking is unbiased. In two experimental studies in a financial investment context, we investigate whether investors are biased in following advice and how biased advice-following influences risk-taking. Furthermore, we investigate whether advice quality, decision environment, and justification moderate advice-following bias on risk-taking. We find that individual decision-makers follow advice across risk domains and advice quality when explained to the investors. However, we identify asymmetry in advice-following, with a bias for risk-seeking over risk-averse advice. This asymmetric effect is robust irrespective of the decision environment but limited to high-quality advice and explanations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10086-10102 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Current Psychology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Keywords
- Advice-following
- Bias
- Explanation
- Risk-taking
- Uncertainty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Followers of financial advisors favor risky advice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver