TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of passivation behavior on micro-electrochemical machining (ECM) performance of stainless steels with different metallographic phases in NaNO3 and NaClO3 solutions
AU - Liu, Guodong
AU - Shi, Jingyao
AU - Yang, Yuxin
AU - Gong, Zeyu
AU - Li, Chaojiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - To investigate the passivation behavior of stainless steels with various metallographic phases and their impact on micro-electrochemical machining (micro-ECM) performance, the electrochemical behavior of representative dual-phase stainless steel (SUS329J1), martensite stainless steel (SUS440C), ferritic stainless steel (SUS430), and austenite stainless steel (SUS316L) in NaClO3 and NaNO3 solutions were examined using potentiodynamic measurements and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). EIS results indicate the charge-transfer resistance of the ferritic and martensite phases in the NaClO3 is higher than that in NaNO3, suggesting a stable passive film formation in the NaClO3 solution. Conversely, for the austenite phase, the passive film formed in NaNO3 is more stable than that formed in NaClO3. Experimental results from ECM reveal a different trend in material removal rates (MRRs) with the use of NaNO3 electrolyte SUS440C > SUS430 > SUS316L, contrasting with their respective MRR trends observed using NaClO3. Additionally, dual-phase steel SUS329J1 demonstrates a higher MRR than both SUS430 and SUS316L stainless steel. This study investigates the relationships between MRRs and metallographic phases of stainless steels, providing practical insights for optimizing electrolyte composition when machining different stainless steels.
AB - To investigate the passivation behavior of stainless steels with various metallographic phases and their impact on micro-electrochemical machining (micro-ECM) performance, the electrochemical behavior of representative dual-phase stainless steel (SUS329J1), martensite stainless steel (SUS440C), ferritic stainless steel (SUS430), and austenite stainless steel (SUS316L) in NaClO3 and NaNO3 solutions were examined using potentiodynamic measurements and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). EIS results indicate the charge-transfer resistance of the ferritic and martensite phases in the NaClO3 is higher than that in NaNO3, suggesting a stable passive film formation in the NaClO3 solution. Conversely, for the austenite phase, the passive film formed in NaNO3 is more stable than that formed in NaClO3. Experimental results from ECM reveal a different trend in material removal rates (MRRs) with the use of NaNO3 electrolyte SUS440C > SUS430 > SUS316L, contrasting with their respective MRR trends observed using NaClO3. Additionally, dual-phase steel SUS329J1 demonstrates a higher MRR than both SUS430 and SUS316L stainless steel. This study investigates the relationships between MRRs and metallographic phases of stainless steels, providing practical insights for optimizing electrolyte composition when machining different stainless steels.
KW - Metallographic structure
KW - Micro-electrochemical machining
KW - Neutral electrolyte
KW - Passivation behavior
KW - Stainless steel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181658087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00170-023-12934-5
DO - 10.1007/s00170-023-12934-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85181658087
SN - 0268-3768
VL - 130
SP - 3867
EP - 3876
JO - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
JF - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
IS - 7-8
ER -