Does money accelerate faculty mobility? Survey findings from 11 research universities in China

  • Jin Liu
  • , Zhaohui Yin*
  • , Wenjing Lyu
  • , Songyue Lin
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of global innovation systems, it has become a universal law that the resource elements of scientific and technological innovation, such as talents, flow along the track of high eciency to the regions that can produce high benefits. As faculty in research universities are important resources of scientific and technological innovation, developing countries such as China have sought to accelerate the transnational mobility of faculty by leveraging income. This study endeavors to gain a better understanding of the motivations for and the outcomes of faculty mobility at Chinese research universities and to determine whether attaining higher income levels through academic mobility can be considered a lever for facilitating change and improving the status of the academic profession in China. Using survey data from 445 faculty members at 11 major research universities in China, this study found a significant relationship between mobility frequency and indirect income. The findings also revealed, however that employees' different attitudes toward income during the process of mobility are a key variable in confirming academic professional boundaries. The findings suggest that more successful mechanisms to attract or retain talented scholars should be developed and that these mechanisms should not focus exclusively on income.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6925
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume11
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Academic labor market
  • Academic mobility
  • Chinese research university
  • Faculty income
  • Global innovation systems
  • Ordinary labor market

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does money accelerate faculty mobility? Survey findings from 11 research universities in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this