Abstract
We contribute to the debate on whether the ‘‘Big N effect’’ on audit quality is due to client self-selection by controlling for pre-audit earnings quality. Using data from the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants, we find that pre-audit earnings quality is higher for Big 4 clients. Controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, restatement frequency is lower for Big 4 clients than for non-Big 4 clients, but there is no significant difference in discretionary accruals between Big 4 and non-Big 4 clients. Our findings indicate that Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors in China pursue different strategies to enhance audit quality. The Big 4 enhance audit quality by recruiting and retaining clients with higher earnings quality and acting more conservatively toward clients with a higher risk for earnings restatement. In contrast, non-Big 4 auditors enhance audit quality by requiring more downward audit adjustments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 31-56 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of International Accounting Research |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- Big 4 auditors
- audit adjustments
- audit quality
- pre-audit earnings quality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do Big 4 Auditors Enhance Audit Quality in China? A ‘‘Behind the Scenes Look’’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver