TY - JOUR
T1 - Deconvoluting Effects of Lithium Morphology and SEI Stability at Moderate Current Density Using Interface Engineering
AU - Shuchi, Sanzeeda Baig
AU - Oyakhire, Solomon T.
AU - Zhang, Wenbo
AU - Sayavong, Philaphon
AU - Ye, Yusheng
AU - Chen, Yuelang
AU - Yu, Zhiao
AU - Cui, Yi
AU - Bent, Stacey F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Advanced Materials Interfaces published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2024/12/20
Y1 - 2024/12/20
N2 - Lithium (Li)-morphology and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) are among the most significant performance regulators in Li-metal batteries (LMBs). While both Li-morphology and SEI composition play key roles in the cyclability of LMBs, less is understood about the individual contributions of each factor to overall Li reversibility, particularly at a practical current density (1 mA cm−2) at which the kinetics of both factors are not naturally separated. Herein, an interface engineering approach is introduced to deconvolute the impacts of Li-morphology and SEI composition on battery performance. By using interfacial nanofilms with differing resistivity (resistive HfO2 versus conductive ZnO), the morphology of Li is varied, and by virtue of similar acidic character of the nanofilms, the formation of anion-rich SEIs is maintained. It is established that although the surface acidity of the thin films enables preformation of a more anion-rich SEI, it is not preserved after Li plating. It is further shown that resistance-controlled, low-surface-area Li-morphology exhibits up to threefold increase in stable cycle life when tested in multiple electrolytes. Overall, these findings explain why Li-morphological control is more advantageous for performance improvement than preformed SEI modulation due to the inherent challenges in SEI preservation.
AB - Lithium (Li)-morphology and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) are among the most significant performance regulators in Li-metal batteries (LMBs). While both Li-morphology and SEI composition play key roles in the cyclability of LMBs, less is understood about the individual contributions of each factor to overall Li reversibility, particularly at a practical current density (1 mA cm−2) at which the kinetics of both factors are not naturally separated. Herein, an interface engineering approach is introduced to deconvolute the impacts of Li-morphology and SEI composition on battery performance. By using interfacial nanofilms with differing resistivity (resistive HfO2 versus conductive ZnO), the morphology of Li is varied, and by virtue of similar acidic character of the nanofilms, the formation of anion-rich SEIs is maintained. It is established that although the surface acidity of the thin films enables preformation of a more anion-rich SEI, it is not preserved after Li plating. It is further shown that resistance-controlled, low-surface-area Li-morphology exhibits up to threefold increase in stable cycle life when tested in multiple electrolytes. Overall, these findings explain why Li-morphological control is more advantageous for performance improvement than preformed SEI modulation due to the inherent challenges in SEI preservation.
KW - atomic layer deposition
KW - interface engineering
KW - lithium metal batteries
KW - lithium morphology
KW - solid electrolyte interphase
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205874957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/admi.202400693
DO - 10.1002/admi.202400693
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205874957
SN - 2196-7350
VL - 11
JO - Advanced Materials Interfaces
JF - Advanced Materials Interfaces
IS - 36
M1 - 2400693
ER -