Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost–benefit comparison of steel slag co-utilization and carbon capture, utilization and storage pathways for cement industry decarbonization: Evidence from China

  • Peng Tao Wang
  • , Fei Yu Song
  • , Jia Ning Kang*
  • , Fei Ying Wang
  • , Song Peng
  • , Xiaoxi Tian
  • , Lancui Liu
  • , Yi Ming Wei
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Beijing Institute of Technology
  • North China University of Science and Technology
  • Basic Science Center for Energy and Climate Change
  • Beijing Laboratory for System Engineering of Carbon Neutrality
  • Civil Aviation University of China
  • Beijing Normal University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Process emissions from clinker production make the cement industry difficult to decarbonize, highlighting the need for cost-effective mitigation pathways. Steel slag co-utilization and carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) are promising options, yet their comparative performance under real industrial clustering conditions remains unclear. This study aims to compare these two pathways for cement industry decarbonization in Hebei Province, China. A life-cycle cost comparison framework was developed by integrating a multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model for optimizing steel slag flows between steel mills and cement plants with a CO2 source-sink matching model for evaluating CCUS deployment over a 30-year horizon. Results show that steel slag co-utilization provides a lower-cost mitigation option for plants located in steel-cement clusters, with abatement costs ranging from 292.75 to 840.60 CNY/tCO2 and cumulative emission reductions of 102 million tons CO2. CCUS performance varies substantially by storage type. Oil and gas reservoir storage can achieve negative abatement costs, while saline aquifer storage ranges from 338.65 to 507.94 CNY per ton of CO2 and yields cumulative reductions of 1266 million tons. Among the 46 cement plants assessed, 32.6% are better suited to steel slag co-utilization, 60.9% should prioritize CCUS deployment, and 6.5% are suitable for a hybrid pathway. The findings reveal the two pathways’ distinct mechanisms and spatial patterns and support more effective decarbonization planning for the cement industry.

Original languageEnglish
Article number148369
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume561
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 May 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CCUS
  • Cement industry
  • Life-cycle cost comparison
  • Steel slag co-utilization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost–benefit comparison of steel slag co-utilization and carbon capture, utilization and storage pathways for cement industry decarbonization: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this