Abstract
The authors regret the unit of water generation productivity under natural sunlight should be revised as “kg m−2” but not “kg”, and the undetailed explanation about the condition of sunlight intensity measurement under natural environment. On page 419, the sentence “We obtain the generation productivity of 9.52 kg under natural sunlight of 6 h, which can provide the daily water supply enough for five people.” should be changed to “We obtain the generation productivity of 9.52 kg m−2 under natural sunlight of 6 h, which can provide the daily water supply enough for five people.” On page 419, the sentence “During the solar steam generation, solar intensity in the outdoor and water temperature of the lake are carefully recorded (Fig. 5d).” should be changed to “During the solar steam generation, solar intensity in the outdoor and water temperature of the lake are carefully recorded (Fig. 5d). It is notable that the solar intensity in Fig. 5d was measured by facing the sun, which includes both direct normal irradiance (DNI) and diffuse irradiance (DI) from the natural environment.” But these revises do not affect the conclusion of the manuscript. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 104557 |
| Journal | Nano Energy |
| Volume | 70 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “High throughput of clean water excluding ions, organic media, and bacteria from defect-abundant graphene aerogel under sunlight” (Nano Energy (2018) 46 (415–422), (S2211285518300879), (10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.018))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver