Corrigendum to “A physics-informed ensemble learning method for battery aging prediction across diverse charging conditions” [Appl. Energy 414 (2026) 127785] (Applied Energy (2026) 414, (S030626192600437X), (10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127785))

The authors regret that three corrections are required for the original publication: one concerning the color-coding of Fig. 8, one concerning two records inadvertently retained in Supplementary Table S4, and one concerning typos in parameter descriptions in Supplementary Note S1. These corrections do not affect the analyses, results, or conclusions of the article. Details are described below. 1. Correction to Fig. 8Fig. 8 in the original publication contained an error in the color-coding of the cells. The corrected figure is provided below, which shows the capacity degradation behavior of the 35 cells in the MCC-CV test group, with each cell color-coded according to its average capacity degradation rate (d_cap). It should be pointed out that the capacity degradation curves and the data shown in Fig. 8 are correct; only the color assignment is incorrect. [Figure presented] Corrected Fig. 8. SOH degradation curves of cells in the MCC-CV group. 2. Correction to Supplementary Table S4Supplementary Table S4 retained two records, B18–2 (with d_cap of 0.31) and B31–2 (with d_cap of 1.85), that had been identified as abnormal during data screening. They had been excluded for model development and analysis, but included in Table S4 by mistake. The correct table is provided below. Corrected Table S4. MCC-CV testing group: charging conditions, aging rates, and assigned folds for S-1 and S-2. (Part). [Table presented] 3. Correction to Supplementary Note S1 There is an error about a coefficient in Eq. (S6). The correct equation is given below: R=0.18−0.0024T+0.178e^−0.2T+0.0073e^−60SOC−0.143SOH+0.00212T∙SOH In addition, K_e and K_s in Supplementary Table S2 should be denoted as K_e,0 and K_s,0, with K_e,0 = 0.27R. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.