Abstract
The goal of this work was to contrast and compare the 2D and 3D flame topography of a turbulent flame. The 2D measurements were obtained using CH-based (methylidyne radical-based) planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and the 3D measurements were obtained through a tomographic chemiluminescence (TC) technique. Both PLIF and TC were performed simultaneously on a turbulent premixed Bunsen flame. The PLIF measurements were then compared to a cross section of the 3D TC measurements, both to provide a validation to the 3D measurements and also to illustrate the differences in flame structures inferred from the 2D and 3D measurements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5310-5315 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Applied Optics |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 20 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Jul 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 2D and 3D flame topography measured by planar laser-induced fluorescence and tomographic chemiluminescence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver