Comparison of 2D and 3D flame topography measured by planar laser-induced fluorescence and tomographic chemiluminescence

Lin Ma; Yue Wu; Wenjiang Xu; Stephen D. Hammack; Tonghun Lee; Campbell D. Carter

doi:10.1364/AO.55.005310

Comparison of 2D and 3D flame topography measured by planar laser-induced fluorescence and tomographic chemiluminescence

Lin Ma^*, Yue Wu, Wenjiang Xu, Stephen D. Hammack, Tonghun Lee, Campbell D. Carter

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this work was to contrast and compare the 2D and 3D flame topography of a turbulent flame. The 2D measurements were obtained using CH-based (methylidyne radical-based) planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and the 3D measurements were obtained through a tomographic chemiluminescence (TC) technique. Both PLIF and TC were performed simultaneously on a turbulent premixed Bunsen flame. The PLIF measurements were then compared to a cross section of the 3D TC measurements, both to provide a validation to the 3D measurements and also to illustrate the differences in flame structures inferred from the 2D and 3D measurements.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	5310-5315
Number of pages	6
Journal	Applied Optics
Volume	55
Issue number	20
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.005310
Publication status	Published - 10 Jul 2016
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1364/AO.55.005310

Cite this

@article{a187cda44bd042998f2354ca3938f50d,

title = "Comparison of 2D and 3D flame topography measured by planar laser-induced fluorescence and tomographic chemiluminescence",

abstract = "The goal of this work was to contrast and compare the 2D and 3D flame topography of a turbulent flame. The 2D measurements were obtained using CH-based (methylidyne radical-based) planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and the 3D measurements were obtained through a tomographic chemiluminescence (TC) technique. Both PLIF and TC were performed simultaneously on a turbulent premixed Bunsen flame. The PLIF measurements were then compared to a cross section of the 3D TC measurements, both to provide a validation to the 3D measurements and also to illustrate the differences in flame structures inferred from the 2D and 3D measurements.",

author = "Lin Ma and Yue Wu and Wenjiang Xu and Hammack, {Stephen D.} and Tonghun Lee and Carter, {Campbell D.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Optical Society of America.",

year = "2016",

month = jul,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1364/AO.55.005310",

language = "English",

volume = "55",

pages = "5310--5315",

journal = "Applied Optics",

issn = "1559-128X",

publisher = "Optica Publishing Group",

number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2D and 3D flame topography measured by planar laser-induced fluorescence and tomographic chemiluminescence

AU - Ma, Lin

AU - Wu, Yue

AU - Xu, Wenjiang

AU - Hammack, Stephen D.

AU - Lee, Tonghun

AU - Carter, Campbell D.

PY - 2016/7/10

Y1 - 2016/7/10

N2 - The goal of this work was to contrast and compare the 2D and 3D flame topography of a turbulent flame. The 2D measurements were obtained using CH-based (methylidyne radical-based) planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and the 3D measurements were obtained through a tomographic chemiluminescence (TC) technique. Both PLIF and TC were performed simultaneously on a turbulent premixed Bunsen flame. The PLIF measurements were then compared to a cross section of the 3D TC measurements, both to provide a validation to the 3D measurements and also to illustrate the differences in flame structures inferred from the 2D and 3D measurements.

AB - The goal of this work was to contrast and compare the 2D and 3D flame topography of a turbulent flame. The 2D measurements were obtained using CH-based (methylidyne radical-based) planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and the 3D measurements were obtained through a tomographic chemiluminescence (TC) technique. Both PLIF and TC were performed simultaneously on a turbulent premixed Bunsen flame. The PLIF measurements were then compared to a cross section of the 3D TC measurements, both to provide a validation to the 3D measurements and also to illustrate the differences in flame structures inferred from the 2D and 3D measurements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978795812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1364/AO.55.005310

DO - 10.1364/AO.55.005310

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84978795812

SN - 1559-128X

VL - 55

SP - 5310

EP - 5315

JO - Applied Optics

JF - Applied Optics

IS - 20

ER -

Comparison of 2D and 3D flame topography measured by planar laser-induced fluorescence and tomographic chemiluminescence

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this