TY - JOUR
T1 - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SCHEMES IN THE THREE-STEP COAL GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGY WITH CO2 RECYCLING
AU - He, Song
AU - Gao, Lin
AU - Li, Sheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 ICAE.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Chemical energy conversion has a great influence on the cold gas efficiency of coal gasification technology. In this paper, a three-step gasification technology with CO2 recycling is introduced and two external combustion schemes (CO-fueled chemical looping combustion and unconverted coke combustion) are compared. Results showed that the CO-fueled chemical looping combustion scheme has a higher cold gas efficiency of 90.1%, while cold gas efficiency of the unconverted coke combustion scheme is 88.4%. Before the water gas shift subprocess, the chemical energy conversion efficiency in the unconverted coke combustion scheme is 93.2%, which is 1.6 percentage points higher than that in the CO-fueled chemical looping combustion scheme. However, more chemical energy is consumed for CO2 regeneration in the unconverted coke combustion scheme, which results in chemical energy conversion efficiency decreases from 93.2% to 88.4%. Therefore, better energy matching between reactions can effectively improve the cold gas efficiency of the coal gasification technology. Besides, chemical energy consumption for CO2 regeneration should be reduced for gasification technology adopting CO2 as a gasifying agent.
AB - Chemical energy conversion has a great influence on the cold gas efficiency of coal gasification technology. In this paper, a three-step gasification technology with CO2 recycling is introduced and two external combustion schemes (CO-fueled chemical looping combustion and unconverted coke combustion) are compared. Results showed that the CO-fueled chemical looping combustion scheme has a higher cold gas efficiency of 90.1%, while cold gas efficiency of the unconverted coke combustion scheme is 88.4%. Before the water gas shift subprocess, the chemical energy conversion efficiency in the unconverted coke combustion scheme is 93.2%, which is 1.6 percentage points higher than that in the CO-fueled chemical looping combustion scheme. However, more chemical energy is consumed for CO2 regeneration in the unconverted coke combustion scheme, which results in chemical energy conversion efficiency decreases from 93.2% to 88.4%. Therefore, better energy matching between reactions can effectively improve the cold gas efficiency of the coal gasification technology. Besides, chemical energy consumption for CO2 regeneration should be reduced for gasification technology adopting CO2 as a gasifying agent.
KW - Chemical looping combustion
KW - CO recycling
KW - coal gasification
KW - Unconverted coke combustion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202623909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.46855/energy-proceedings-7274
DO - 10.46855/energy-proceedings-7274
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85202623909
SN - 2004-2965
VL - 11
JO - Energy Proceedings
JF - Energy Proceedings
T2 - 12th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE 2020
Y2 - 1 December 2020 through 10 December 2020
ER -