TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate chamber study on thermal comfort of walking passengers at different moving speeds
AU - Jia, Xinyu
AU - Wang, Jiahao
AU - Zhu, Yingxin
AU - Ji, Wenjie
AU - Cao, Bin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Walking, which is a common activity for passengers in airport terminals, has a considerable effect on passengers’ thermal comfort. Previous studies have only focused on the effect of the metabolic rate (MET) on thermal comfort. However, the role of the relative air velocity during walking cannot be ignored. To factor this, 26 healthy male subjects underwent three sessions: walking at 2 km/h for 20 min, 4 km/h for 20 min, and alternating between walking and standing at five operative temperatures (Top) of 20, 23, 26, 28, and 30 °C in the current study. In addition, MET was measured in 25 healthy male subjects while standing and walking at 2 km/h, 4 km/h, and 5 km/h with a 5 kg bag. The results showed that walking speed affected the dynamic variations in subjective responses, thermal sensitivity, mean skin temperature (mTsk), and MET. However, there were slight differences in the neutral Top (Tn), the most comfortable Top (Tmc), and the preferred Top (Tp) between 2 km/h and 4 km/h. While alternating between walking and standing, Tn, Tmc, and Tp decreased during walking and increased during standing. The difference between thermal sensation vote and predicted mean vote increased with the standard effective temperature, and the predicted neutral mTsk was lower than the actual mTsk value. For young males, the upper limit of the MET range for analysing the airflow cooling effect in ASHRAE Standard 55 could be extended to 2.25 met.
AB - Walking, which is a common activity for passengers in airport terminals, has a considerable effect on passengers’ thermal comfort. Previous studies have only focused on the effect of the metabolic rate (MET) on thermal comfort. However, the role of the relative air velocity during walking cannot be ignored. To factor this, 26 healthy male subjects underwent three sessions: walking at 2 km/h for 20 min, 4 km/h for 20 min, and alternating between walking and standing at five operative temperatures (Top) of 20, 23, 26, 28, and 30 °C in the current study. In addition, MET was measured in 25 healthy male subjects while standing and walking at 2 km/h, 4 km/h, and 5 km/h with a 5 kg bag. The results showed that walking speed affected the dynamic variations in subjective responses, thermal sensitivity, mean skin temperature (mTsk), and MET. However, there were slight differences in the neutral Top (Tn), the most comfortable Top (Tmc), and the preferred Top (Tp) between 2 km/h and 4 km/h. While alternating between walking and standing, Tn, Tmc, and Tp decreased during walking and increased during standing. The difference between thermal sensation vote and predicted mean vote increased with the standard effective temperature, and the predicted neutral mTsk was lower than the actual mTsk value. For young males, the upper limit of the MET range for analysing the airflow cooling effect in ASHRAE Standard 55 could be extended to 2.25 met.
KW - Metabolic rate
KW - PMV
KW - Thermal comfort
KW - Walking speed
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85138775668
U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109540
DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109540
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138775668
SN - 0360-1323
VL - 224
JO - Building and Environment
JF - Building and Environment
M1 - 109540
ER -