Characterization of phthalates in sink and source materials: Measurement methods and the impact on exposure assessment

Tao Yang, Haimei Wang, Xuankai Zhang, Jianyin Xiong*, Shaodan Huang, Petros Koutrakis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fate and transport of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in residential environments is significantly influenced by emission and sorption processes, which can be characterized by three key parameters: the gas-phase SVOC concentration adjacent to the material surface (y0); the diffusion coefficient (Dm); and the partition coefficient (K). Accurate determination of these three key parameters is critical for investigating SVOC mass transfer principles, and for assessing human health risks. Based on the mass transfer process of phthalates in a ventilated chamber, a novel method is developed to simultaneously measure Dm and K (key sorption parameters) in sink materials. The Dm and K of four target phthalates in a common T-shirt (sink material) are determined, and compared with those reported in literature. Results demonstrate that the measured parameters are in good agreement with those previously reported (relative deviation < 20 %), validating the effectiveness of proposed method. In addition, this method can be applied to determine y0, a key parameter from source materials. Results indicate that y0 determined with this method is consistent with that measured by literature method. Finally, dermal exposure analysis is performed, showing that dermal uptake of target phthalates is greatly affected by clothes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number122689
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials
Volume396
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • Dermal uptake
  • Diffusion coefficient
  • Mass transfer
  • Partition coefficient
  • Surface sorption

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characterization of phthalates in sink and source materials: Measurement methods and the impact on exposure assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this