Ballistic properties of silicon carbide ceramic under weak support conditions

Jiawei Bao, Yangwei Wang*, Xingwang Cheng, Fuchi Wang, Huanwu Cheng

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Ceramic materials play an important role in the composite armor structures used to defend against armor-piercing projectiles. Previous studies have focused on understanding ceramics' energy absorption and ballistic properties under strong constraints. Specifically, this research studied the ballistic properties of silicon carbide (SiC) ceramics under weak support conditions. Ballistic tests were performed to measure the resistance of SiC ceramics with different thicknesses against 7.62×54mmR armor-piercing (AP) projectiles under weak support conditions. The results were then simulated and analyzed using the LS-DYNA software. The study found that even under weak support conditions, the SiC ceramic has a higher ballistic efficiency than the 2024-T351 aluminum alloy. As the thickness of SiC increased from 3 mm to 15mm, the ceramic self-constraint effect on damaged parts was enhanced within ceramics, leading to an increase in energy dissipation during both the dwell and penetration phase, and more projectile kinetic energy transformed into the internal energy of the projectile and the energy of the ceramic. In particular, a 15 mm thick SiC ceramic can effectively defend against 7.62×54mmR AP projectiles. The study highlights the importance of considering the thickness and constraint effect of the ceramic itself when evaluating the ballistic properties of SiC ceramics with poor constraint conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1764-1773
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Materials Research and Technology
Volume28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • 2024 aluminum alloy
  • Armor-piercing projectile
  • Ballistic property
  • Ceramic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ballistic properties of silicon carbide ceramic under weak support conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this